From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38797: 27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite of xref-pop-marker-stack Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:18:09 +0300 Message-ID: References: <06080F99-49F3-4936-A39A-D135F5ECCEE2@acm.org> <0c88bcef-f07d-5a38-fa7d-b0ddd048cb48@yandex.ru> <87ilxm27wz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfwqi7dd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4c25c196-ba72-b509-c5d7-f015c37009f8@yandex.ru> <877de1lfb2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5404"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , yyoncho , 38797@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 17:19:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1kk-0001DE-EM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:19:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1ki-0001YO-EC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1kc-0001Y5-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1kb-0003rY-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1kb-0003uU-RF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38797 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38797-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38797.163517510614972 (code B ref 38797); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38797) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2021 15:18:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1ju-0003tE-Hn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com ([209.85.208.176]:44703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mf1jt-0003sx-0M for 38797@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id s19so9886320ljj.11 for <38797@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ETuV59L8f34XxZXYb0dquxx83WbjJzEoMUw1bnJ//PY=; b=QnfJGz4ywnvfMmiRhP/GXsCgoRfbJz4hymhr/p+GpiFZoefjzaEU4rB1RrPqrC20gv br1dH1txWuDB20+3s/or3NnguDKFpn+skkWZXH66T7URRHTdYdQZ5SQrOf4JgTrl5awu ki6zawYhJnGSh33m++mWDI8AhUNObdkm+V0sQPC4YAG4nMFJwvqaqoaIpo8MaoPEe32h HyB1O+n6/FAxFcxyJEW0Chftal1qcd/MdCGGYqUrn5WI2UhaL+t7ktMS9UE7+2oxNFzj Q1RfwPoCuTXxP2bMkZxgg88C+iCI8D0F1CRLlIcFFPDC9zEh/vwSnE241ufNwGwOueGg x+/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ETuV59L8f34XxZXYb0dquxx83WbjJzEoMUw1bnJ//PY=; b=gBbXPJw7oIY4OjE2lGMIuqsBsX2EjUktCMREH5/OyHH4wHVRfTTEjgx3hSZ/QGMyb1 HRFoRGslM/AZxscfPvQqNiukj5PQy3hvCaXxPJn2I8QvL1nAjPIXch3Dt0WyXqAlKfI1 +qxK1lffZ8TmAf0J85y1HhRDrfGIATZXo+vMwN5bIZhBmjOsP/+G6q36o9p3Ys9qw0jS QsWElpji3wpKvsdYL6DwVTreYpgpX9B3Fzn9lBMeQ+5mQ5dhS7AOs0eUKrsRIwbsuDtq uFXyQbnSDgWtJXxd7shMvfQSl0A95CJhftyzaScIyVYx6aGduEo7OuMlRA2V0zo7+H8I OH8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532d24hRlE4xNwnhQkbr/HCSnpJ3ygJkgrjbuLm/c7M3CK5Jjnhm Ytj+xy5Jr+s0wI5VF7bXe4NuRfF/mDI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybT8s506/l0NebAQ/i6WEUlPsbhp8nDHLclf9pT6XghMI5fSmCqrGdNMee0qj7i7pB4wSHoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e8a:: with SMTP id z10mr19339861ljk.243.1635175091062; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.248.29]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a16sm1669074lfu.274.2021.10.25.08.18.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:18:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877de1lfb2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218302 Archived-At: On 25.10.2021 10:44, Juri Linkov wrote: >> It's a nice intermediate solution, but it would also be nice to be able to >> quickly iterate across previous searches. No? > > This means adding another layer of complexity. Remember a mess > of deciding how to switch next-error navigations from different searches? > Switching multiple xref searches will have the same level of confusion. Unless we do want to be able to switch next-error navigation sources this way? Alternatively, we could uniquify the Xref buffers in a more predictable way (e.g. by using the caller command and the input string, somehow), and then have commands xref-searches-back and xref-searches-format switch between the resulting buffers. > BTW, shouldn't xref-go-back/forward support next-error-function? ;-) What kind of support? Not sure I understand, sorry.