From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47244: 28.0.50; SIGSEGV in long-runnning Emacs Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:36:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87im5ofp3z.fsf@md5i.com> <83czvvdw7o.fsf@gnu.org> <14e14f28-7ece-cd98-5e49-d4583a0153a0@gmx.at> <16b279ef-a1c2-cd41-b18c-69383174c72a@gmx.at> <87a6qs7z60.fsf@md5i.com> <83eeg3kawg.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e6kp9t.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuouknpb.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg4eknh5.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1jykmt0.fsf@gnu.org> <2d0dbdc8-3678-cd21-234a-9c63bb004629@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "mwd@md5i.com" , "schwab@linux-m68k.org" , "47244@debbugs.gnu.org" <47244@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 16:42:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFZL-0000cI-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:42:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFZJ-0007uL-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFVK-0002VS-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFVK-0004sF-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFVK-0001UM-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47244.16171150255606 (code B ref 47244); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2021 14:37:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFUP-0001SM-7F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:47211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRFUN-0001RX-QC for 47244@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:37:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1617115012; bh=6Y2h8PyzmFX9Z60qhuBM6731ELDcT9geURZFR4awhL4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PTgCh/tQ9KIZA6RHyzJ2ZgZYZevwCUzBPmXN7os7WMZBpz8+Eol0vDciS0iJNJIGJ A9j82N0ynlrubS0f5yzVB/nWl/DKvZZ+AaNBKXBEb/h1IXebjyjuTlWCK2MBPez32E 6CwKQjnhiiV4mF8RAkpE0wAMV6kRG6+j3kc/WcVw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.203]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MrQEn-1lwOqy3cXv-00oT65; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:36:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nZqouPu8qIEFl0ngxwKuQxd77FlqTgMGCAYTk0zzOLtlp8bU9RK CsZXidc8Q01nCZqv5ZwJ88H/My7AAz8xiOSXYp+llngyBqnEA87hFkdY7mUKd8R87P8xpHu S+BP4KDY5Y2Ny1oRl7IDuHFH1mhJu0GCL6lrbS7wfYBzaP2J5KXrqVwg2TjInDoyq/8Nf2E jsX+GwsZTJK+MofbK9XMA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:XIRIhOlN6q4=:rAry3T/JrxorgmlUfDCrw1 0/fRrU4MWou+EStC6DuAXZw5wG1iUEs6OD0rqvgxxAd89N5tkyQ7CB1kY2Q4loBInya+9cx0+ T+cfuG/dHlUqSNI62Kp63znsx6Kze98OnCIxMIyBSCJ43VWyI8pc0+5vRlG8w2NoJCmeHjhyb xkgQS2jJEutHHlQpcWhGXZoUR/AuCy5DKFF3NJcsrnBgyybhS1BsYdv3EQBWTaSTTYMOkMjMH jPwd+MTN0Gix8HSlHXVb8LHSCE56dZ+TJjZl+r91Js9qWv3rHzzQcyu46pXjXjBX7V9AwdUAG epCjB3dIeH89oKuZRA0hQunGpK9540g5Te/I1Sg5bGpjmxnCFcuGyPSyy2vuwNqfHztWBX3R+ 1bJL0yjw8IuKIaPaB/hX8Knx0n6ApyGOeqOcczcxus+V275H2GgI+JEAxVwrICMreZnY4PaUG fyaGzbu0QGLYv7/P1gYIKSnv4zg+LY+Y6qq7jZCGk34WDph+6Z03nLUs/+KBF03/rs0OStDi3 tEZhgbfhiI4z5eu9i9d4/7SV2/lrBt8IZP64STIUew+6lVPPFXXakbCew386hhMAfJkOUjxqZ Gcw70hBfRHOlu5FzXiP/qnSWQvarP5F8NTdWwXSxa7KdlH4fyF4bD6CYz4CpU1EqEQ2ypdQXb tk9vrbANrXiScG0vF0RE7L4vs9Mk1aoVZH+fHJ+pQsCiv9oOXQBNtkz5CBqogzChmD4LBgWTJ rt7AdIR/bd0ELYD8GQ8x6MWu7sSzRpqeYzWXuMpJnY4biO+XvU/IPHKemJ0eQa0nJX9VDaiA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203306 Archived-At: > The breakpoint I put on the error() clause added to buffer.c triggered > again in the new build without touching any of the easserts. And I thought I was overdoing with them. This error is a bit too elusive for my brain. Are the buffer names the same as last time? martin