From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29412: 27.0.50; dired-toggle-read-only should (at some point!) check that the direcory is writeable Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:00:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <87o9nt2cvo.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> <87y2i35ke7.fsf@gnus.org> <505c79af-0056-4f66-aca8-9559f6ef2bff@default> <878sa2qfmq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ft494zfz.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Marshall , 29412@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 13 18:04:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1koUni-0008OM-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:04:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koUnh-00055j-PR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:04:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koUmw-0004lX-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koUmw-0005s0-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koUmw-0000zR-Cn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29412 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 29412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29412.16078789863741 (code B ref 29412); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2020 17:03:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49980 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koUm1-0000yH-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:43804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koUm0-0000xn-RR for 29412@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BDGrYmK094169; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:52 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=v57G2MYU57q7XnAqwO7QqVJ2X9282zyXKVQ2zxAPS7U=; b=BeAMJkNiHKkSKBfcDUsV3ui7iZ4ivUcbPEakOw/A78Rre8RKmMo7QECdfvoCwaz9VXVH vx9I9mpoIQZd0w/Zd+TbYTVXdOYDO4g8y45QckPT8TLnYoDFkOutjANGb/TsDj45Hl/+ AnobJgLxkaUwof6N4lm5q8JYqFOyI3iz8lSq0O+HaEs4qA8gCrsMzNpURolUvvfzqYHV 63C5CR1bhcVbizb/IhlmJ/d/ekDGga1BtGOFFxZdVh6/ukJSkvta+R5qdrqdk10g3rKs MR3CoL+ts/7/P9ib3IJUPKdgMSQ6CoZQ0ksU+ZG3ylgvrfLOSN25075x+0JiSHDNO4WV Gw== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35cntktjd4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:51 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BDH01Du034315; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:00:51 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35d7stjbrw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:00:51 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0012.oracle.com (abhmp0012.oracle.com [141.146.116.18]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0BDH0mX4006651; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:00:48 GMT In-Reply-To: <87ft494zfz.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5071.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9834 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012130134 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9834 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012130133 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195973 Archived-At: > > OTOH, displaying a warning might go unnoticed by the user. > > > > Then maybe better would be to ask a y-or-n question > > whether the user still wants to edit the unwritable buffer. >=20 > Makes sense. I've now done this change. Why do you keep making changes before even reading responses or giving people a chance to respond? Not one argument has been presented so far, by anyone, as to why this case should be treated any differently from the read-only file case. I've given arguments why it should be treated the same. (They're the same arguments as would be given for the file case.)