From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34749: 26.1; `delete-windows-on': (1) doc, (2) bug, (3) bug, (4) candidates Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:35:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <> <<5C7E4BAB.3050508@gmx.at>> <<83mum5accd.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C824BAC.4090907@gmx.at>> <<83lg1pa4oa.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C82B9E1.1080302@gmx.at>> <<83zhq587g6.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C837BD6.9010200@gmx.at>> <<83ef7g8gbc.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C83BC9B.5020803@gmx.at>> <> <<8336nw807g.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="130690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34749@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 09 18:36:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftO-000XrW-Gh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:36:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33516 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftN-0007b2-Hc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:36:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftC-0007a6-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftC-0006Yg-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftB-0006We-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ftB-0002Ql-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34749 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34749-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34749.15521529369302 (code B ref 34749); Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34749) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2019 17:35:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fsl-0002Px-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:42314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fsj-0002Pk-FI for 34749@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x29HYlRL163141; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:35:27 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=FjOG4pcy01s4if/BbKwWn71CUQLQeGSbaoqzXr7H7cU=; b=f1iLsFfUoCGaYH4gKZ3VIzaTGzhJjOTduFnDqibVK7xnc/64f3DY9fJb0teeuz1G2lnm Hg6/6W2G15yK2JFY5mUZ/ytX6sYofrrjzkQs+YM0PutGUR+8CVJVl0BGDDypVZAsWtwU w1JyMxDCvqtE2qPVZCFp67PYgifDrcJ82YpmMy8c0ntUnSUBQ16zWuxl6c7zgSwczhIU J7DrX7K6aPY7ekLSiBUVcPnrbRFWIyR4R7ClLBnfc3MvywzeF4IrQ9WlRY4visvM+cTT ewYSW+W+CtBfIj8on6f5KuUW41Qe/3feNkrNYCXANu2QuvXdIJ6en6/SAw/ASqACpCnd zQ== Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2r44wtscs2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:35:27 +0000 Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x29HZQ3U006404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:35:26 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x29HZPoG007896; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:35:25 GMT In-Reply-To: <<8336nw807g.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4810.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9190 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=778 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903090134 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156191 Archived-At: > > I wonder if it would help to give an example where > > we show correspondence between a spec that uses a > > string argument to `interactive' that specifies a > > few args to the function, of different types, and > > a spec that uses a Lisp sexp, which when evaluated > > produces a list of those same args. >=20 > There's an example right after that text. I don't see an example that shows the correspondence between a string arg and a Lisp sexp arg that returns a list of args. I see two examples with a string arg and (not "right after that text") two examples of Lisp sexps (one of which shows something you should not do). I see no correspondence between the string examples and the sexp examples.=20 In any case, the question I pose is whether Martin feels that some additional example(s) might help.