From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34794: 26.1; doc of `read-buffer' Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 14:34:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <<> <<831s3g7zv1.fsf@gnu.org>> > <<83r2bf7w21.fsf@gnu.org>> <<83o96j7vl4.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="54338"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34794-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 09 23:36:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZp-000DsW-7S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 23:36:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZh-0004MV-MI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZc-0004MP-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZa-000339-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZW-0002zy-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kZW-0005D6-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 22:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34794-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34794.155217090519954 (code D ref 34794); Sat, 09 Mar 2019 22:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34794-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2019 22:35:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kYb-0005Bm-80 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:35662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2kYZ-0005BG-F6 for 34794-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x29MULhp169022; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 22:34:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=jp+bx/XJ1KIYpeVHrMwXbdx6Xn6OVcD5BLGkwT8qC6A=; b=ieM+vdd/PgxcfGOORfqBsBtoIei4xm/eV6qXIhlhQJr1DOH7Q4eDOkrLelblI+NldOlU xRQP5L5iR1/Rgn1Le2BrzEohF8B7hngM2n2BX0pwFmbpGxM/LlMnLfPSwT0ykwpS/ecB ZkiF8nOdoWoqOFXASvq4l9g9ZRkI39KbFssohKzVi8LAjSNqaB82cYOWTLAAG/UaN63D g8uQDuSH7dVjnI6ZkU4tIvGksZfp7hsR5gR2EjypqWRKjyWUVLUPxiDmd5ZyY9VGRRNA N7rI6u1ieXjORSvQ9D1q9b/n5SULlwdKytvDzelwiWi8Q3vc8ZyvdjGmfVgLyE8KVxDk eQ== Original-Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2r430ea2j4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 09 Mar 2019 22:34:57 +0000 Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x29MYuBs016843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 9 Mar 2019 22:34:57 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x29MYu2f008904; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 22:34:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83o96j7vl4.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4810.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9190 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=918 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903090171 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156207 Archived-At: > > > It's not hard to state what the default DEF behavior > > > is, and then later say that if `read-buffer-function' > > > is non-nil then the use of the other args is up to it, > > > i.e., not necessarily as described above. This is > > > not unusual for a function that optionally accepts a > > > function arg as one possibility. > > > > Please suggest such a text, because I definitely don't see an easy way > > of saying that, without triggering more bug reports like this one. >=20 > Didn't do anything about this. Feel free to reopen if you think the > bug is not done without that. You asked me to suggest such a text. I just spent time doing so, and detailed several problems. Then I see that you already replied to yourself asking me for the suggestion, saying that you've already closed the bug. Please reopen the bug and consider my suggestions. Thx.