From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aidalgol@amuri.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18438: 24.4.50; assertion failed in bidi.c Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:59:32 +1200 Message-ID: References: <4745242cd3e424a6c4d5db0e8d3e33d0@amuri.net> <54109EB5.2060801@amuri.net> <8338bz9tt7.fsf@gnu.org> <153d642db591b29dba44712b44194385@amuri.net> <8361gt8jjz.fsf@gnu.org> <8338bx8enz.fsf@gnu.org> <47b6853869d32221142fecc7dff1d3e8@amuri.net> <83sijs46yu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410836428 18953 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2014 03:00:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 03:00:28 +0000 (UTC) To: <18438@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 05:00:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj09-0001yJ-FS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35469 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj08-0003Vr-Id for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj00-0003U4-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTizv-0008Qy-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTizv-0008L9-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTizr-0007ol-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: aidalgol@amuri.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 03:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18438.141083637529994 (code B ref 18438); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 03:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2014 02:59:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTizO-0007ng-MA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from goat.amuri.net ([203.99.132.195]:45725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTizK-0007nP-IL for 18438@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:59:32 -0400 Original-Received: from webmail.amuri.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by goat.amuri.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1612BFF455; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:59:32 +1200 (NZST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=amuri.net; s=mail1; t=1410836373; bh=w5LS1B7QvSKj8RKVBJg8dD960tXyEuUtzWmimWCvliY=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; b=NPXlhnbaI0fMbOnMN2OuLa4VnesI3V5kjeeAG6ux+tF84mGw1PMChdcKR4un6wCpE CsL4NlIzUWKxHj/V1pwBugDgLaVqIV87RNix+NLiFQL4L5nnT5bMxddwKnXRdgQYx4 NburjZQU2SFd61NsgdcUfl0wzask0dUw7sYia5d0= In-Reply-To: <83sijs46yu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Sender: aidalgol@amuri.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93399 Archived-At: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:47:21 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I closed the session, but I got another bidi.c assert, this time in >> a >> different place. Is this one more like bug #17817? > > Yes, it does. And like that one, it makes no sense: it clearly shows > that 'type' passed to bidi_check_type is STRONG_L, a valid value. > Here's the relevant part of the backtrace: > >> #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=6, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at >> emacs.c:361 >> No locals. >> #1 0x00000001005b9a67 in die (msg=0x100a5aad8 >> "UNKNOWN_BT <= type && type <= NEUTRAL_ON", >> file=0x100a5aad0 "bidi.c", line=329) at >> alloc.c:7160 >> No locals. >> #2 0x00000001005010fe in bidi_check_type (type=STRONG_L) at >> bidi.c:329 >> No locals. >> #3 0x0000000100506230 in bidi_level_of_next_char (bidi_it=0x223d08) >> at bidi.c:2430 >> type = STRONG_L >> level = 0 >> prev_level = 0 >> next_for_neutral = { >> bytepos = 0, >> charpos = -1, >> type = UNKNOWN_BT, >> type_after_w1 = UNKNOWN_BT, >> orig_type = UNKNOWN_BT >> } >> next_char_pos = 1 > > The only reason I could think of for such assertion violations is > some > asynchronously run code that doesn't properly restore registers. > Which is pretty far-fetched, but what else can explain this? I still have this session open, by the way. Do you want anything more out of it?