From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16096: emacs_abort in bidi_initialize + 126 / Fselect_frame -- uniprop_table returns NIL Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <2E3E1BB0-6BF1-4628-AF50-5E9F623AFD09@gmail.com> <83wqjdxtbj.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppp4y8jz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386694509 10142 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2013 16:55:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, 16096@debbugs.gnu.org, konrad.podczeck@univie.ac.at To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 10 17:55:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaU-0004DV-S7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:55:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaU-000105-CJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaN-0000qW-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaM-0007ia-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaM-0007iR-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQaL-0004nt-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16096 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16096-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16096.138669445618403 (code B ref 16096); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16096) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 16:54:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQZb-0004mj-2n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQZX-0004ma-Kp for 16096@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQZW-0008TU-8R; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:54:10 -0500 X-Spook: high security Centro terrorism insurgency Roswell lock X-Ran: dKE3L(iOcO[]18Pm:V;VoCedTI:25A6{I0 (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:28:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81682 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > How come an Emacs built on Dec 9 has its last change in bidi.c in > September? Is this the development trunk or something else? If the > former, which bzr revision does it correspond to? Because he's forwarded you an Aquamacs report, which is derived from [some unspecified version of Emacs] with [some unspecified number of changes].