From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34343: [PATCH] Make project--find-regexp-in-files work with remote files Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 03:15:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <9d65284f-7a64-5e9c-ab02-fbbd1be41689@yandex.ru> <87r2bt1tio.fsf@gmx.de> <2cfd53b2-8202-a321-a853-da0c949b0f15@yandex.ru> <6cf8bfa8-3873-d3db-9139-854359027e8a@yandex.ru> <87h81mqiq5.fsf@gmx.de> <0ff03b20-20d8-b6c0-c876-3fd525586180@yandex.ru> <87mubdps6s.fsf@gmx.de> <87blrsz3tf.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="171396"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Felici=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A9meth?= , 34343@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 29 01:16:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFf-000iPD-Io for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 01:16:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48036 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFd-0003Hr-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60899) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFX-0003Hi-9b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFW-0008Un-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFW-0008Tv-4d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMFV-0007Aa-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 00:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34343 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 34343-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34343.157757852927469 (code B ref 34343); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 00:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2019 00:15:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMEy-00078y-Tb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:15:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com ([209.85.167.49]:43588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilMEw-00078X-Si for 34343@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 9so23076196lfq.10 for <34343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 16:15:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zA0WgBg73C928T/eCiSUVohi+p79hgJ0Eg1rVzteJBc=; b=qyrkzjhVjjS4z8Gd97ltgO3pAth8bfniRO9nUykThpZZkmeN6scJ42tIypDjN/VkFW uL8uAYEev0retlnrRiyvPlsFT5cPw74rwuE1LKyU0O+Cau+AzlgzXMFJSzJHX7+7iWJp fcgQBZOe7t4nTJM/1xODKV0S/X8k8T6CjSN9u3F7gmXVFY1iEiudAWUk7a4OvO4HjAGv LP8oP3kWkPJfiSVErtgrkmxss2kO1r70MDqN5F5S3ERzgCT6EzTIb0xRNpsyAP7hXfJo vCzFYt8hCNdt5AVtko8HJbhu+w319mL83MHhdW5NUH+UB3DotsUGiL/0t2s+OpgoOje/ RjIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zA0WgBg73C928T/eCiSUVohi+p79hgJ0Eg1rVzteJBc=; b=ezTFth/CxxhK9DvcBryRgWdKSzoyBvYZGW7YueA/YkZYfj3Z8pN81BRJbZ6/nRcQKJ Jdrky6oQOLbMdQ98GQud8qqaM29QRrHsEzQr8udNXrK9sd1nmDk+6Zxx08eXVyoIq4WU Uq/LvRcw0AyzkbGOldM0cguSWbUlOYs7uWEsJaoUcabM1/5g7SLm3CU5ghBimc742jcM 86u3wW3D9qJN1ZyVtylSyvuRhU0BeKJuZEz5Aw9fK2e09fMqOkhJIpTZES17nIp6V18o uiL581Rs44EQ46ho/W+68GOMlSiJ3mi9dlxNohDwUcWAx4TmIOwVQ5e2pn9faXbhga+E gr0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXySYrfcsgg+1JWUv/ZSETnJKBZngGCRlJpHyAo14nIJo3RjNd+ 99flYf0b7DDgHxCsKOaAVjPjH0hVVmM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTeVJJ+241/gd1tEzk4POE0BD4TW1IOtD11YwfWImtMA9nMjR/uayPCLeUMzGMqcFuy++ZlA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:3f51:: with SMTP id m78mr34341680lfa.70.1577578520726; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 16:15:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm9125339ljh.65.2019.12.28.16.15.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Dec 2019 16:15:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87blrsz3tf.fsf@gmx.de> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173871 Archived-At: On 28.12.2019 20:46, Michael Albinus wrote: > I said already, that expand-file-name isn't needed for > file-local-name. I will try to find a better implementation. Sorry, I guess I misunderstood you, then. I thought you meant to write a new function, "a cheaper file-local-name". BTW, does file-remote-p always call expand-file-name if the connection is already established?