bug#21472: 25.0.50; REGRESSION: (emacs) `Coding Systems' uses curly quotes for Lisp strings

[Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>]

> > This sentence:
> >    On a decentralized version control system, push changes from the
> >    current branch to another location.
> >
> > where "push" was quoted, is now reads like incorrect English
> 
> Why?  It's idiomatic English to talk about pushing changes in a dVCS.
> See, for example,
> <http://docs.telerik.com/platform/appbuilder/version-control/third-party-
> vc/push-changes>,
> which says “You push changes from your local AppBuilder repository to your
> remote Git repository.”
> 
> >    The external border is normally not shown on fullboth and mazimized
> >    frames.
> >
> > Previously, "fullboth", which is not a word, was quoted to indicate
> > that it's not a real word.
> 
> As I understand it the section is intended to define “fullboth” as an
> invented English word, which is fine: the invented word should be defined
> with @dfn (which quotes the word in info files), and other uses of the
> word should appear unquoted just like any other word.  This is standard
> English style.  The manual should not quote every use of a neologism,
> as scare quotes are not a good style for a manual.
> 
> That being said, there were problems with the section: it did not use @dfn
> to define “fullboth”, and the paragraph defining “fullboth” was written
> awkwardly.
>   I just now installed a followup patch to fix that.  I added index
> entries while I was at it.
> 
> > Many places have a quoted text replaced by @dfn, although there's no
> > terminology here that we describe or index.
> 
> Examples?  I put in @dfn when I thought the text was defining a term.
> 
> Indexing is a separate axis.  If the text uses a term that should be
> indexed, the index entry should be created regardless of whether the
> text surrounds a term with @dfn or with ``...'' or with nothing at all.
> By and large my recent large patch worried about quoting, not about indexing.

I do not object if people want to discuss other occurrences of quoted
terms in the context of this bug thread, _provided_ this bug gets
addressed as reported: it is only about _these particular quoted terms_.

IOW, let us please not lose sight of _THIS_ bug in some larger
consideration of other quoted terms and phrases (which I did not
initiate, and in which I have not participated).