From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46908: 28.0.50; Dozens of spurious markers in buffer-undo-list Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 09:40:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o8fzn9fa.fsf@web.de> <0ca78c1b-7737-8a87-9edc-deaa551677fa@gmx.at> <87wnumswhr.fsf@web.de> <6ccba248-7643-280a-4560-88872fb08457@gmx.at> <87sg5asr6k.fsf@web.de> <7b04f87b-8d7a-e151-5b4a-d77bd6ea1506@gmx.at> <87y2f1m7ez.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12667"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46908@debbugs.gnu.org, Yuan Fu To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 09:41:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUr-0003Bx-Ad for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUq-0000do-6E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUg-0000db-RL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUg-0000XV-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUg-0006Fr-Hg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46908 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46908-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46908.161502003023989 (code B ref 46908); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46908) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 08:40:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lISUA-0006Eq-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:40:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lISU9-0006EU-78 for 46908@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:40:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1615020022; bh=9Qsceo1Pg3fVxXsOMPx/x47tQQ1zCgEL0IzDar0tGeA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LjjSeeHAf7U9UC1grL/tv7ESJuX3pDzMk5AjT0WQLDUoENcXGyQh1nElbnyGhiNAK Oiji/XEAkZV33xL1WkJHBMwwj0ykvNlrg+TD/3TdqJznYn09ik3lvyTakSlt1Oaxxx jqRRwRmDNr2yqmNiNc37S1LhGlKy2NwPqHNOZ2vw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.190]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2E1G-1lllKi0aQI-013ifk; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 09:40:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2f1m7ez.fsf@web.de> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HRQ5bDZFO+7vc26rnSF6vUzBZmnwXpSntuPECcORym0VA9Z8G3G QS7W/uYqzj2dkxk/YXPD5wVIOuz/2S09OiyMwCkGTZ0dl6ErVwKAYPdhUPsi7vPCDJE8XG+ 3hw6iTuiVAGdsD8TMgaZzib9K72ii2wt1vGNPXA2qBfXjQuByvdkO30oxX8m3MlERVdZge5 atCLGEhoJzPBWvM8qzr9Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:2jpkyN9rV5s=:rZgIKVHnQ6uyF7Z7bvUZWH QYolT6R2aE2UfMl+UUMFILNAe5kJC0Z4LqqCsukrWabTH02Mw5szmS+0ruzfwGHFWe+voJAb3 jejPQO8Csuk5E8UNJ3iDx5JXrcsKtXVk3lJ3fcutW71YMIh2HIxjJNVHHA8M+dw0XG9BU+EDI 5PrAZhzwYhetk+ASJHeFEhkSSu30hcfPZ41uG+t9E9g70NBBxqNInDkewB37b+/X4G52M6/uK HPL8BIbZvGyllkJFCW9pdkXK/gPTBT4H3/HMZSXmyHEebZNFSlPwlyOn+mvcfw4E9fvzY2MDK J8ntJPO1AGZSW0LBMmcohnnCn40g2hSx66bFmBQ1OFeeWyakbhwtG4Xa16Wcf25M+xZ5IUGvB zViN9t+JttMav1wlWsUMA7YhTKXmpHSkimxA2N1EbR6oxzl2RWxChthljlL79zn9qhNI5flSC Eud9FTZ8XL6H56t0XFloUht286gzsxp4wutfZ2DZCxlGrmmthxBeQFHksy94geuJTNXm2c3Zk M28d1tIXtn3vsMw1dhdLA6zc+DZPlAlW8CSN6ac/o5k5Fqgmp7Bg/XVrKwKYKEpppBQIy/FrB r+JkVuzOblJ9dIBW0BJKscE92dmHu7GcASSe2TsXAEe2EHm4EisuPHak7C0DpTtTLHVE9+f/R qyftDQZoVizGyzjXUT3AjkzNVQsVpER01fAzaNCzz84JIkF9NapmExJfOAOqxieO7bJ4LcFl5 OLRSkAmVNbaZB7rRUNDdFAjijos+ey/XWYErnBJ/6ArziDuVA1c/wyHxSdoAgv4UhBLSJItP X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201600 Archived-At: > My observation: if I set undo-buffer-list to nil after reproducing the > issue, `count-markers-in-buffer-undo-list' reports "0" afterwards. What else did you expect? Or did you mean in all subsequent runs of your scenario? > So I > wonder whether what we see is maybe normal business and an unfortunate > side effect of undo recording marker positions and gc running not often > enough to prevent these accidents? I'm not sure what you mean. Here, when trying your scenario, I do set `buffer-undo-list' to nil first, so the initial insertion is not recorded and run `count-markers-in-buffer-undo-list' from a globally set key so the minibuffer is not involved. And meanwhile I cannot reproduce your scenario with Emacs 28 either, I get zero invariably. martin