From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4026: `characterp' undocumented optional arg 'ignore' Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:51:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4A786578.7080503@gmx.at> Reply-To: MON KEY , 4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249405648 5554 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2009 17:07:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 19:07:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYNTq-0005hN-B5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:07:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNTp-00008i-O8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNTX-0008So-ES for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNTS-0008P0-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44999 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYNTS-0008Oq-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:38832) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MYNTR-0007Ni-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n74H6lLH029727; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:06:51 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n74H04mu028282; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:00:04 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: stan@derbycityprints.com Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:00:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4026 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4026-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4026.124940472727774 (code B ref 4026); Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4026) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Aug 2009 16:52:07 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com (mail-gx0-f224.google.com [209.85.217.224]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n74Gq3k8027769 for <4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:52:04 -0700 Original-Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so6947432gxk.1 for <4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.199.12 with SMTP id w12mr12205889ybf.300.1249404717842; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:51:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A786578.7080503@gmx.at> X-Google-Sender-Auth: afa7dabec5578e5d X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:06:59 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:29858 Archived-At: Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:44 PM, martin rudalics wrote: This may be another one of the +/- 500 `bootstrapping documentation' arg >> bugs... > > ... which are not really bugs. Well they certainly aren't features! :) > below. I'd appreciate if people could help me point out other false > positives. How would you like these to be formatted/pointed out. What is most useful for you/your code? What are your criterion for 'false positives'? > martin s_P