From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:48:52 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87ee3d4cli.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0d35c82.fsf@gnus.org> <877d92unqn.fsf@posteo.net> <83bkyednvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cziudmyg.fsf@posteo.net> <838rtheogd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilskbgul.fsf@posteo.net> <83ilskcp9i.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8whio1a.fsf@posteo.net> <83czipkylw.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmmp9c63.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8wgk7tn.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfrk3b86.fsf@posteo.net> <834k0ovket.fsf@gnu.org> <5eb376b4-5f7e-6b00-286a-8bd0950dae22@yandex.ru> <83pmjbrsiu.fsf@gnu.org> <6dd7e47d-4115-7e2c-4ee0-d4e00f684a90@yandex.ru> <83ilp2sljp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2063"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Cc: 54296@debbugs.gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 13:53:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o1Raf-0000NH-PI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:53:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1Rae-0004fg-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1RXE-0001BD-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1RX7-0006nw-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1RX7-0006sT-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 54296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54296.165529374526359 (code B ref 54296); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2022 11:49:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1RWC-0006r5-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:33567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1RWA-0006qb-Bu for 54296@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id bg6so22822741ejb.0 for <54296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 04:49:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nkybLifd/A6LHPK1MGxNyW9Qd5p1MP0Z2DsskFGs6Ug=; b=LqhO/YwWKtk0roRVk33Uw9ZwIcQ0cj6jQciMVKYDOSmRCAhMdxRQS5BnWEHVyzg1A7 SgCyaNesuEhJibQTZEZhS+ngHVYEldylnjxRYJa6J2iJYoBKy8eenF72bGnictmcGhU7 cuCjBbwC878eRWc/FAeqpOMjecGqYWQx3aK/15Kql1igZZNWknUHf4FXRIe+63YL+IGg OC5R1nw6DCk7gZF+chZnMYi+Sr3U5AhGkXvTcwHwFEog+ShIU4oKiG2JAGOJrX4r/B/S TOvs6vQVsg8jk9C3T+RIEybf17kEm6eo7OazKmaQMFoqueedoM8LOJqXo5crFkHPkAst wrGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nkybLifd/A6LHPK1MGxNyW9Qd5p1MP0Z2DsskFGs6Ug=; b=DuV0EQGfw1XjeaVUe0FhC9hBrU1jcidSor6isJYdOu19X2XxP3mxfONYPHlTlRFAsa 87qU+zo2v54dMR1v8S+iUlbOXuOQGjuC3krniHPggKuZJLK9u/BtASx4WSGCp44qm3Uc AU6HA2R9RAAckWaXNmXV5eBcD0fR8XGA4zeUwxXy5/DZ/mB7d4yz/CmX7XpVZmeqpiaa x+StrhYMAgpjF8zL39YLL0RGNExJYJ4wO4EWC1DcdQ7mf0EGYRW1ezORGS+j0UCKxGGl cumceYGC07hraDqGy4b+jNkMJ18xYm7MHrykW9oCFZM+B/L94GuPxhz91S2aCBldoqEu 2btw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9Q9VuW0FzuU6yYfWMY/61ep7L15Zld66ewHW2upY1Z2eAYGDoC LVoQ83gAEhUWdjV0DQ5S6BI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIaHpgNroB/cbrXdyPLgBbeVusDXAGN9mnYl+Vv+MIfWCRnkszxXFejSEwuHHwvMmqrQzYkw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:535e:b0:712:ac3a:f0b0 with SMTP id j30-20020a170906535e00b00712ac3af0b0mr8608386ejo.316.1655293736216; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 04:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.236.48] ([173.237.64.48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e3-20020a50fb83000000b0042e309906desm8987164edq.58.2022.06.15.04.48.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 04:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83ilp2sljp.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234565 Archived-At: On 15.06.2022 05:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > This seems to be some misunderstanding. I wanted us to have only > 'derived-mode', not 'major-mode'. Okay?... > But Philip was unhappy about that, > due to existing usage of 'major-mode', and eventually 'major-mode' was > left in the code. Or at least this is my recollection of the > discussion and its resolution. 'major-mode' was left in the code and in the docs, but its meaning was changed. Hence the backward compatibility concern. And 'derived-mode' was dropped. Or you could say that 'major-mode' was dropped, and 'derived-mode' was left it, but renamed.