From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39977: 28.0.50; Unhelpful stack trace Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83zhcs80e5.fsf@gnu.org> <83imj88tpt.fsf@gnu.org> <550fbc22-09db-d30b-c194-8f26b5dca05f@gmx.at> <83wo7o6nxs.fsf@gnu.org> <60dd4ced-a2e5-ed17-0570-b7bdd2a557af@gmx.at> <83blozckn2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="76628"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: enometh@meer.net, 39977@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 14 11:38:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4Bd-000JoN-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:38:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4Bc-0008TJ-Bi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:38:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4B8-0008TC-QO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4B7-00086e-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4B7-00085r-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4B7-0004oa-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39977 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39977-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39977.158418226918490 (code B ref 39977); Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2020 10:37:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4Av-0004oA-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:47343) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jD4At-0004nw-5n for 39977@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 06:37:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1584182256; bh=SgMbafOAJpGYEL2/rGgisljuPJIX6+PegqxLOF4Ym/Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=g4xoI+2nXMEvmuAMms6GxkLUCqzD6/tzOh1a47lHBnyIcg+vQYZeZSBc/IhtggWw5 vF+HPusk0wfUd+iyQ8DeAkmjB7HQcpzR2/ICMMer5znhf1woSg0MIvCJ+OEuGsXh0+ b2Zajzk8QeyX1hXOfgjHEJAxGs+rKsLmwTcqBpN8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.49]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MTzb8-1inFXz0Mni-00R00K; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:37:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83blozckn2.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JKdkfUQx99ESOqeshMUkXCqIXbHinj84h3ZZARqjIOwn2f7KK9v oZU+xXU05r7YB2ULMDm4N0nVmcMMG4RCewIt8PkkCu4lL1UKqbKVkoRvz4uUuDygwj+2OSG 4ORTEGB9RmhSRxaZsnXuuWnvc+vx5G5090/AhHiiv/2LEHIlhcPQpi3HyVfu6Tdq9f0tjSX jmidQ+yz8UpnDpgiyCUEA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:MZAH9EL8fb4=:WGtZgmoSHhI6822fH51zmM xfGUnzTkNJAk82ArN8EfSDedSAm7tRNIPWnkUF85qNgFeKV6RsT23KupGajLbyaSrR9L1rfRf TWkcs8xHe6IN43ywLfd+vk+pOjh1E8IdgCuIy9BAjZzcremzFo838CU3nD+tPTPJRfW7RZk+0 M2mrWpoLwyaopXnK4BBav/MdQG5JUElQWKIjqDG0Mw0e4BCRRvWqXVe1mrXAN8w+/T9w/yk9/ ApfOaH9jcDk/8ax5QiONhIJ/uhd/mRYw5a1F4AlvRAv7UR4MVWzwHcu0dDTgRHrb2GUNDjbo9 YylIbrh27tNHSzvb712rJjbxAFr/AeTCBPB0NgLPHblEsN9uY04A88bBkOuA0OJosuAHr5ATM B4RayMo5Br4NJIqSoL/Wp/AabdRRSzPgrTCs1I0NqCZD/a0AEUu8ED3plk1rR8Te1dz0YP6k3 26nETNFwRRHf/qDxONx3dnGEvwekI8d0YCTtB6SLWXV1KBvvPqumX3dX9lXUbPd9dq4jxWFep yZHfTr6MEwltmeMdMzOo/G13A3/u3JVRE+DYdld8TcvfiRd6ftzVmdneZFa5zA4uUFBhgEUwU sFRDDu1ueISYdhKi25Ru9c8bDt20s89dsojXMX7l3RyFzPElvRn1gCWewlma3Y5HUkU6suj6g A6fi71kVOAWoxZNSTzR3MuS3WmsFAzD0/3x6YPKvjg6sp5kUv6UXifrOyfO+MvDvVL7wqhTNC hvz8/Xleq9SiytyeQ8JblMaOzYqew1W3mHw4WdpfhdLEzpPIR8wAX/0rUy6WmQYRoPsH9c4G X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177336 Archived-At: > My understanding of the scenario in this report was that the value of > selected_frame didn't have time to become updated before redisplay > kicked in. My understanding is the same. But we should not allow redisplay to kick in before selected_frame is updated. > If you think the problem is elsewhere, I'm okay with > leaving this crash in emacs-27 until we understand the cause of that > and fix it elsewhere. I just hope you will have the solution quickly > enough to not release Emacs 27 with this crash. I don't oppose your patch and that's why I didn't comment it initially. If you think it's urgent to fix this specific crash, push it. But we obviously might also let more serious bugs pass through that mechanism then. If Madhu has a simple recipe to reproduce the crash, we should IMHO try to profit from it. If he responds at all. martin