From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33664: 26.1; Document vars and functions in `cursor-sensor.el' Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:32:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <> <> <<83zhte3f4n.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544380332 30695 195.159.176.226 (9 Dec 2018 18:32:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 18:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33664@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 19:32:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3s6-0007q0-QT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 19:32:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3uC-0008NQ-Tk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:34:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3u3-0008NK-Fy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3ty-0008No-2h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3tx-0008Nh-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3tx-0007KX-OV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 18:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33664 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33664-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33664.154438039728118 (code B ref 33664); Sun, 09 Dec 2018 18:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2018 18:33:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3tE-0007JQ-CM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:35426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gW3tA-0007IS-Vh for 33664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wB9IWvTX039251; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 18:33:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=rI8mfOiH6O0/BkmUV9qhqW0WgIdqJ0n1hVPYxeZmFx4=; b=NwQFN0Kg+IFGHZh6A7hnPfAZiWb+91waKfr8x1lxypPUveX9lB34SpcNPXZE8ULyXi3J AGKcPEZp8rBjbOaCRor0HCetxA5yt250fy4xpccJmotKIV28wshJDkbBq/e15BON8j+/ qPuuEJyqtSvg00eUFKq42XNNYgOmEoZ2F+3KqmIUC6YUObGf81uT+AYF2zYl8ekKQH4d 8s4GJypT+T8lfYfOVlBk8eKmxA1daFMWSG7UCPZBuZ79i7TkGFBKan1TYn7aVOSQ3aE+ ZvvaAADeeMn3qBOujXsS26hFM11Qdc3kLL61jfb9TRLec2+QnGDdmA8X6TY+LYMxmdd8 pw== Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2p86kqju3w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 09 Dec 2018 18:33:06 +0000 Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB9IX1Oj010135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 18:33:01 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0020.oracle.com (abhmp0020.oracle.com [141.146.116.26]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB9IWxGd008338; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 18:33:01 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83zhte3f4n.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4771.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9102 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=582 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812090171 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153271 Archived-At: > > I installed the patch below. >=20 > Thanks! +1. The bug can be closed, IMO. But one thing that I'd like to see/know, is some idea of what "at a much lower level" means here: This is only done just before redisplay happens, contrary to the old `intangible' property which was done at a much lower level. Specifically, I'd like to know some behavior differences - examples of when `intangible' text property is handled and what the resulting behavior difference is. Even examples of problems that using that text property can cause would help. Putting such additional info in the Commentary would be useful, I think. It would help motivate the new mode and make clear whether and why/when you might still want to use the text property. Or if the answer to that is a solid no and never then it would still help to better understand.