From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50459: 28.0.50; Python shell completion is incompatible with flex, orderless, etc. Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:50:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87wnnsl1d1.fsf@gmail.com> <87czpijixk.fsf@gmail.com> <877dfqjfwu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50459@debbugs.gnu.org To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 10:52:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFn2-0000ZL-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 10:52:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFn1-00049Q-FB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFmt-00049F-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFmt-00086L-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFms-0004fu-HC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50459.163117746317896 (code B ref 50459); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2021 08:51:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFlv-0004ea-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:53362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOFlt-0004eA-2G for 50459@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:51:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1631177460; bh=4GrbAxOWBee/2ciPyQMEG46MtEmL67lta+Nnv1aXxmY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=bcz/hb96GL73U6TXFOAJKziX5IzbOFPW8xT6m+5FQ3tDPS1J8cpgOCJuTZokP2jPT n723HCxt3bDCfF8vKd5XPWI6Ym1B7DvdILiM92Rom8yDNI1WkNix109UF81eOavuE1 ZQaLwh7qlb7hITn26WfrBfiwR1OEC/5JpJs+K/cWxyvgXa0DAHVfJc/eZ4BKZkDkcu tSG9vR79BerwhZt8C1S0KSp2dcmWKMYIDz22bmKAfaydcTMRcBNj/Iv6cgudAXpcVR Tfw/Xu8xA9nWZuImh+Mk/GbTjnTIIzuhe2gdM+8/oLLpQRW9ME0GCxZMwy1Do41rX5 T4VjLZrGVoDvw== In-Reply-To: <877dfqjfwu.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213888 Archived-At: >> It's not broken, it works as designed. Instead of asking each user of >> the completion mechanism to implement a specific function for substring >> / flex completion, these mechanisms tell them "please return all >> possible completions, I'll do the filtering job for you". > > Right, this is not a problem with the flex style, it's a problem with > the Python completion table. More specifically, with its notion of "all > completions". > Exactly.