From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48117: 28.0.50; Update of loaddefs.el during normal build is unreliable Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:47:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8335v8c7o0.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf8zbyr8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 17:48:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVNE-0006NX-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:48:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVND-0006bm-JM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVN3-0006bd-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVN3-00005M-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVN3-0006sE-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48117.161979767526410 (code B ref 48117); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 15:47:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVMx-0006ru-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:59678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcVMv-0006rk-Ac for 48117@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:47:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1619797672; bh=VOCmOf3W/6tDTaZ0tcNayVm3DfJD9J9Fo46Re7HeHUw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=ay5glJLfG9ncxA3UQ5jATuvbnKnTkswELDbxYtR1dzaQ3QFptqs+0U+sVcqPPttM4 haFtyo66hogdPm+VUJVQ5nXbnXidVV0yLJGQA9NAWeJuebZMmrdmiuSNiRVpJaChEr Ps3OoLEhfVVHo6onqTGs9ow+eguPqf4aqCpWxOg2gde+nWonv0HV3L8G4C6Yp7g55N Vrkkme/IzBv9Hi4p1Lo/E+oUkUv1wq4UxMrFGi3DVnKLNRAzVEtz5b7GRMP74bTsZp QqZ0PxBSdYsGZ72JxZJSGv9hWo/U03RW44mEy9jFQRkiH8QBmXALEkd+0VJTzelBvL 90JsEThkPtT2w== In-Reply-To: <83lf8zbyr8.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205267 Archived-At: >>> These updates should happen automatically, they should not require >>> people to "make bootstrap" or manually regenerate loaddefs.el. >> >> Would it not make sense to include these changes in their respective >> commits? > > loaddefs.el is a generated file (and so are the other *-loaddefs.el > files). > Ah, yes, indeed. >> Another solution would be to have a cron job running somewhere and >> automatically pushing these changes once a day or so. > > How can we do that for files that aren't versioned? > I have two questions: Why are these files not versioned? The generated lisp/loaddefs.el file is AFAICS identical to the lisp/ldefs-boot.el (after calling admin/update_autogen -L), which is versioned. Why is the lisp/loaddefs.el generated?