From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11669: 24.1; Build failure on amd64 with x32 ABI Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20436.63644.849695.332693@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20438.21705.2229.857235@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20442.54404.887127.876816@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340262824 4785 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2012 07:13:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11669@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 21 09:13:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbaE-0003MR-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:13:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbaE-0004Pe-QT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbaB-0004PF-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Shba6-00035W-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Shba6-00035Q-Of for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbdV-0000X6-JC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11669-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11669.13402630092024 (code B ref 11669); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2012 07:16:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbdE-0000WV-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40335) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbdB-0000WN-DR for 11669@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShbZj-0004ix-Ud; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:08 -0400 X-Spook: covert video $400 million in gold bullion PLO USCODE X-Ran: ZGoO$6~bh@$+'&$?KBE-2\eTZ53O1ZMq^4&NcJKwsdL@ips0vWd51r^awYZ#t[W<0My=Bg X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <20442.54404.887127.876816@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:21:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61160 Archived-At: Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I've now applied a somewhat different solution to the Gentoo package, > namely patching the m/amdx86-64.h file, see attached patch. (This > should also ensure that it isn't accidentally merged to trunk, because > the file doesn't exist there any more.) The two patches don't (?) seem to be equivalent (wrt DATA_SEG_BITS and ULIMIT_BREAK_VALUE). I'd prefer to install the configure one, since it is more consistent with previous treatments. Unless there is some reason to prefer the other one? Accidental merging to trunk is not an issue.