From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: 24892@debbugs.gnu.org, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is@lostca.se>
Subject: bug#24892: {s, }brk removed from FreeBSD 11.x and later, arm64 architecture
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:52:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9396165-da2e-3c41-ec2b-070ce9c885bb@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvminrxc7f2.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
On 11/09/2016 01:46 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> If so, what is the difference in value there between sbrk (0) and ((byte
>> >*) old_bss_addr + old_bss_size), in the region of unexelf.c that computes
>> >one or the other?
> The former includes the heap.
Yes, and I'm curious about what the difference actually is, so that we
can figure out how to compute it ourselves now that sbrk has been
withdrawn. On FreeBSD 11.0 x86-64 (which still has sbrk) the difference
is 0 for Emacs master, but on AMD apparently the value is something
other than 0.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-07 6:01 bug#24892: {s, }brk removed from FreeBSD 11.x and later, arm64 architecture Ashish SHUKLA
2016-11-07 15:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-08 17:54 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-08 20:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-08 21:41 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-09 3:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 8:27 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-09 15:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 1:47 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-10 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 16:59 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-10 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 0:22 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-10 1:40 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-09 4:29 ` Ashish SHUKLA
2016-11-09 8:26 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-09 9:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-11-09 15:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 17:52 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2016-11-10 9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-11-10 16:23 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-10 17:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-11-10 17:22 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-10 17:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-11-11 2:48 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-17 17:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-18 12:29 ` Ashish SHUKLA
2016-11-18 16:21 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-18 20:20 ` Ed Maste
2016-11-18 20:23 ` Brooks Davis
[not found] ` <CAPyFy2AL_OZWYpp+tiLSro_3WK1-H8Pdjy4-ZhUQChMQqageUw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-11-18 22:22 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-19 6:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-19 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-02 13:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 13:23 ` Ashish SHUKLA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9396165-da2e-3c41-ec2b-070ce9c885bb@cs.ucla.edu \
--to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=24892@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ashish.is@lostca.se \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).