From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Brooksby Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74785: 27.1; Fill-paragraph in RST mode does not respect line blocks Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86msgyva15.fsf@gnu.org> <376758.1734386711@eskebo> <86r066o4ke.fsf@gnu.org> <86y10emjic.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14672"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: stefan@merten-home.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 74785@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , James Cloos Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 16:35:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZba-0003aY-Pr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:35:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZbH-0004LF-Cx; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZbE-0004HW-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZbE-0006fq-DC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:35:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:MIME-Version:Date:To:Subject; bh=3t0DaM5MJkZeH8tVrCkmQaqmcppBiUFswLw+WTbbmE8=; b=OP+GSHyeKhfPePc+ckQhnnOf7RCHCu+bLFfIvgALLacLI02w85GHPq1POLdsd5tK/ECKYRVxtqdws3KRV1dVxSDubQjoAtatPLHYibPtbs0u9pKP7DQdSdStzByEeqVFNR6xs0jfcBOBhNKWUA1FFMQraT40qQYegZMl7ufhZCCQukKXsrEU3nWFvkIfAkXNDBuJE2RBPeNDSj4Jg761uW4kGZcXu04enSrcRLeR7cK2YFxYrDp8tj/sEK4Bdan/RhYfZJ5TM0zacqNzyJZhcQN6nrak07NzB9JZAVymQbasVbypVh1r41WS+e3WDyY3tuJd9bgHfbc56JRJ8CEG8Q==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZbC-0006KQ-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Brooksby Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74785 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 74785-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74785.173444968324293 (code B ref 74785); Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2024 15:34:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZas-0006Ji-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from petrel.ravenbrook.com ([46.235.224.209]:34746 helo=mail-gateway.ravenbrook) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZap-0006JX-SS for 74785@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:34:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gateway.ravenbrook (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-gateway.ravenbrook (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7559C5D4C8; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ravenbrook.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=pmg; bh=3t0DaM5MJkZeH8tVrCkmQ aqmcppBiUFswLw+WTbbmE8=; b=iTT+xrjUH+rISgvJq1WKgd2WrFsmFT6LQOo9a r7h3aCu4KbkepGT32kNiXpHEBFP8Zzj/ahqaTz/fHaLzKe3QYLtzLhepTEGKR4vQ 5VOXerIGm2Dd19/1iGb+jYJYqtRKV6oT7XR14cTF8VWEJqeimp3T6koQ3Q9HJM8/ gq8caOLo5lSzHl8f0Mflw5AnbgDFazuddt6RNmvYr8FGaqtoYYeZs+N9QhLVqNcE qIV8WWSZ40zQNi1WKM56shbSHapvCjxdNN381N8oxoki4Q02Kn1eHEyEekWIMpUp zJ3XOcAYVRxAv15XhiBBziycvqylZVsMPU3uZmedQeB0GK/Vg== Original-Received: from mx.ravenbrook.com (mx.ravenbrook [IPv6:fd42:d923:e021:7be6:216:3eff:fe75:c2cc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail-gateway.ravenbrook (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A7B535D4C4; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from mx.ravenbrook ([fd42:d923:e021:7be6:216:3eff:fe75:c2cc] helo=[192.168.1.29]) by mx.ravenbrook.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNZan-001R9M-B7; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:37 +0000 Content-Language: en-GB, en-US In-Reply-To: <86y10emjic.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:297306 Archived-At: On 2024-12-17 15:11, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: James Cloos >> Cc: stefan@merten-home.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> 74785@debbugs.gnu.org, rb@ravenbrook.com >> Copyright: Copyright 2015 James Cloos >> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:49:03 -0500 >> >>>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> EZ> If that's bug#24081, then I don't see any rejection there, only a >> EZ> request for clarification (which you gave). Then the bug was for some >> EZ> reason closed several months later, with no rationale. >> >> that is the bug number. i also received an email reply, which i see is >> not in debbugs, claiming that it were not a bug and overtly refusing any >> acceptance of ot work on a fix. i don't know why that reply is elided. > > Neither do I. Did that email CC the bug number, or was it sent only > to you? And who sent it, if I may ask? Excuse me for not being familiar with the bug system, but is it possible to discuss that bug in that bug's thread, rather than having a discussion about bug management in this thread about RST verse handling? Thanks.