From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 10:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83mtsxzund.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> <835yzjwbnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516044215.23yd5ae3yeby6kaq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83zgwvuu5z.fsf@gnu.org> <83tun3ur7h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516065904.5wweuipi23oy5g2x@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83pmxrulm4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2590"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 16 10:36:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFt-0000XJ-7L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 10:36:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFs-0000b8-9n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFm-0000b0-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFm-0004QA-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFm-0001nB-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 08:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.16211541406832 (code B ref 48408); Sun, 16 May 2021 08:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 08:35:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49673 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFP-0001m8-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCFO-0001lt-Br for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:35:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1621154132; bh=xvG0WiIjwS+hp1D8tyUqr2WrhOSCvnGCruV8zk5fCGo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Q3m6rckCgq0yu+gqYsSpElhCsRCG2GSny2ShsAsTS8wmLgmDtnV7LfTfjVCcK1ydI ocPDrZXLJGBs7Xd9ZR2zVEApXwjJtJGKPtqoghx7a+HlUHCkdzosEZ25DMqUvsSvUQ gbFjBy6sqJ7d7/rhW7qjnGu2qh6+gLsFC9bl/kUE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.102]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MxDp4-1lWxv227WC-00xapb; Sun, 16 May 2021 10:35:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83pmxrulm4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:m08RDPjNw0+Hy6Yq/iwAsjsJFIuhEg1CEoesObLf1OHePHeWZlf bJUDBxGAmTTExJQbmZ7utV2SpNrSCfWVs7iwV1mSmxqG0HuUrQlPuBQmZnH6Kn5c11TncAt KRMhCzevv+iFbIgUCcNExSWv2IK+8z0/6t9+TNtfODcukfaWcUBwFPNA5ytReB4YTH30VMW fr7JfjnAxSzhAX+XsoP0Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NlKWjvdnlVY=:ZlH6jkBgH289dXDI9sD9AC U+8QYv7Bfqhy1pmGaOyvQupVVjutboJ+qH8LSl2z9gqoU6hFJnAnUm9E7mT+P/LkUT2xd6M7D crWY+0aZs/XIZglhyrOrEjzcDt2F8qmx9S163CfstAa/zJK8SifGwX6P9Eevt6Yfs3XMBrlJ9 f6vwMArBhtDWSampQTehkssGzXBG6Rgu5U1nJMoaIP16JSBu0DD5SZeFn+5FZUM10wXYj8LC1 gcCPxrA+dJocPwWGrWprAhamYn3WF+n0fphRMDkrnvUY8MjDA2akq/m2cIwuSYXs2iKZlAtZs 8/lEc8OyglYveHD6KIYCHrLxVsYFmkotM19ymFhbxFQ6+CmoaDrJZM6I1k58cw4iLYnsmSzJl mGKBo1qNgT7GqYDES/eIt6B+asfYyJMxV/e4hP65pXJPUOgH++4y1Qpj9MDc6XO7PxNhaG6iM vHBzk30xmA7sayMZgPkTqX+GohuQdYphR3gTWi8OjmlZobcYYU3rYYRYsSWGfvDCAZuV1v5+I +b4enFtQhWNhMPU7QSnxuChIVnWoXWMc0xyATwxueTXvrD8GPvn4ijaHAuP74W8EdFTD36pBv WVPt3OBAPsq1D17sHoakjqAM4Af5cUq3y8RfyEj1jFkJvXAc/ENGZwjWTc1oI0hosKMYfw0cu kPc8Vffy7BK/NH6QNP3PDCfB6S4fv7vpDGaymEpbkN3IgSXkVkhGSMQFGfIBHkxzmh3KA5IEw O8xeltcrI8V9fF5ujWK9IV3b2v2U1UM/ykQFlbxVLaEM9iJc4xgRSfP2ly9/5wTFatP05fs6 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206644 Archived-At: > Martin, same question about this one. I decided that there's nothing > wrong with how we compute frame-type in the display-*-p predicates; > it's window-default-font-height that trusts the 'display' frame > parameter too much. WDYT? OK. But was Boruch's original idea just checking for (stringp default-font) worse? martin