From: "Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 33375@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33375: 27.0.50; Nested function definitions
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:01:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c56e598e-92c9-9e7e-60a2-ec46a0bac8c9@easy-emacs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <835zwz8y77.fsf@gnu.org>
On 14.11.2018 16:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
>> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:06:52 +0100
>>
>> (defun foo1 ()
>> "[Some docu]
>>
>> (defun other-foo "
>> (interactive)
>> ;; defining another function inside
>> (defun foo2 ()
>> (interactive)
>> (message "%s" "Foo2")
>> ;; another syntactically correct function just badly indented
>> (defun foo3 ()
>> (interactive)
>> (message "%s" "Foo3"))
>> )
>> (message "%s" "Foo1"))
>>
>> ;;;;
>> Results of evaluation:
>>
>> (foo1) ==> "Foo1"
>> (foo2) ==> foo3 ?
>> (foo3) ==> "Foo3"
>
> Why do you think there's anything wrong here? AFAICT, each evaluation
> returns the last sexp evaluated in the respective function. foo1 and
> foo3 have a call to 'message' as the last sexp, so they return the
> message string, but foo2's last sexp evaluates a defun form, so you
> get the result of that, which is the function foo3. IMO, this is
> expected and correct behavior.
>
Basically these forms were made to display a beginning-of-defun bug.
See tests in previous posts.
What puzzles me when evaluating:
(setq a (foo2))
a ==> foo3
(call-interactively 'foo2) ==> foo3
But M-x foo2 RET messages "Foo2"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-15 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 9:39 bug#33375: 27.0.50; Nested function definitions Andreas Röhler
2018-11-14 10:06 ` Andreas Röhler
2018-11-14 11:46 ` Andreas Röhler
2018-11-14 15:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-11-15 7:01 ` Andreas Röhler [this message]
2018-11-15 12:36 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-11-15 15:04 ` Andreas Röhler
2018-11-15 15:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-11-15 15:14 ` Andreas Röhler
2018-11-15 15:21 ` Andreas Röhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c56e598e-92c9-9e7e-60a2-ec46a0bac8c9@easy-emacs.de \
--to=andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de \
--cc=33375@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).