From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:08:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <15605.1448748702@allegro.localdomain> <17193.1448823812@allegro.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448824224 3789 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2015 19:10:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike Kupfer , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 20:10:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MN-0006RM-El for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:10:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MR-00084W-5l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MO-00083U-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MJ-00086a-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MJ-00086V-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a37MI-00032y-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22043.144882414711647 (code B ref 22043); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 19:09:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a37LO-00031n-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:45462) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a37LM-00031e-7y for 22043@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id tATJ8lrD031192 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:08:47 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tATJ8jkX016035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:08:46 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tATJ8hKY031562; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:08:43 GMT In-Reply-To: <17193.1448823812@allegro.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109412 Archived-At: > Would something like the following be acceptable? >=20 > The search commands that are described in "Incremental Search" and > "Nonincremental Search" perform character folding by default, thus > matching equivalent character sequences. >=20 > If that's no good, an alternative might be to say that "Some search > commands ... perform character folding", and to add a note along the > lines of >=20 > To determine whether character folding applies to a particular search > command, see the Help text for that command. Isn't it correct and sufficient to say that non-regexp incrementalsearch uses character folding by default? IOW, isn't this default behavior true for all incremental search commands except regexp search, and only for those commands (no non-incremental search commands)?