From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36408: [PATCH] Fix typo in doc string of file-exists-p Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <> <<83imsqi5hc.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="82026"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 18:53:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgu8G-000LCb-Mw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgu8F-0004o5-Gi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:53:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsz5-00044a-3s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsyu-0000nd-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsyo-0000dO-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsyo-0002oz-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36408.156173634610768 (code B ref 36408); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2019 15:39:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42840 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsxu-0002nc-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:37914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsxs-0002mr-0D for 36408@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5SFXmWg166722; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:38:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=1h+CN9JwAZwVrcJuG5m4wf1VcdAtQUT/GEUbrY52HUQ=; b=xtKkoJM90gEN6WHwObDDQKIbnv/k7RXLnwrBfvSZO0ZFRCE+NgbvWvmg11WpoLqs8T3Y FstB9f/RZNA7mmh2A/uk0tSzrhZPxLYrDZtxCe+AuzLgtbuMuOfk3I+mtQJxrNEzpYYc S9vxKE/Wr5xBX7DYLQU8lVNU8ESPisLKivufyiCFQL8eas6G+adokkdLvqY6aIG22w8C ipcg69jnMNa4feck8725N7oJKiDRpOXLF2ycRxst1f2o7/kMDVD12ZeohKLV1AWl8RxO /d0gNJ0Aa9TLxXB87roCqVdEgHTwo+CCP5dnVdWW0aMUW4SH2gv0XQC7N4pD9hceTLMz ng== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t9brtpccn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:38:58 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5SFcWMM166547; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:38:57 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2tat7e103j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:38:57 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x5SFcuvw015953; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:38:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83imsqi5hc.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4861.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9302 signatures=668688 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280180 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9302 signatures=668688 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280180 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161747 Archived-At: > > - doc: /* Return t if file FILENAME exists (whether or not you > > can read it.) > > + doc: /* Return t if file FILENAME exists (whether or not you > > can read it). >=20 > AFAIK, this is a long-standing stylistic issue. I'm not sure what > people prefer or whether we should insist on consistency in these > cases. FWIW: There's no stylistic issue here. The first is incorrect; the second is correct. You won't find any style guide that would opt for or approve of the former: "___ ___ (__ __.)". That's not even a sentence.