From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16496: 24.3.50; Some completion functions in Emacs still return a function of no argument Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 00:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87siskndvn.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ft4jaskj.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="650"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: 16496-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 06 23:41:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1km2iU-000AdV-8C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:41:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km2iT-0007UF-4y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km2iF-0007Sv-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km2iD-0006oj-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km2iD-0007RC-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:41:01 -0500 Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 22:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 16496 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Mail-Followup-To: 16496@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, dgutov@yandex.ru Original-Received: via spool by 16496-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16496.160729441328516 (code D ref 16496); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 22:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16496-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 22:40:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km2hQ-0007Ps-PA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47]:32820) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km2hO-0007PV-Sd for 16496-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id k4so11759580edl.0 for <16496-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:40:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VKKo5v5arsNAyKq5StPvJOjmI80gbXPVCNYyLK6PiNs=; b=i7gOkp32sFc/w5C5a6HdMPgKR2dK7NhrFdykTAuy9MlRMoyFadDxXsM1fzsPS2uHOo 9uyJ81fGKN11F4vlpPbticlEcQDw2J7FpfbRJ8SnHD9VpqmnEXO0QooR0Aqfcst1Ta8h n8QYXQ5xO+PjlGJHvPest9/hV/Ey1I+3evjnXP6Dv4aEWGKowW+hdTxqN6xFOMRK/TK5 6EBt5XtBaayFXUov8U/gfDdqViRV4vp3HnseKDYvoLkdH6u9FX9P7PvQsWYomYt1haZA KHYeu5zWiBVv3m5+dhm9JdOCebqkhgdYs8hfVzcz33Sh80BMn9/qpY5sItxPzkHcsVkI /r3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VKKo5v5arsNAyKq5StPvJOjmI80gbXPVCNYyLK6PiNs=; b=ku0iB/ghjHEkNl49AZJnLaBwsY2COxWRIiVsuvdNwKq6sE9ezCwiX8Szvib0UQUFtc Mzxk4zai2ASM7hTGF7j/55Z1diSqiExI/tCoXco4dj+oa/PREZIP3Z2ydU3XZKkuj8lW a/FuA+c41XuRdSkS5HIsr5aW4F71aEHgQCprVTNPJJSMtiR7NtxBkBj5/Nu40RKHApIh Mio04Q9ZnnGDGnhNWVExSRUWtyq+W49eY6d3xRePj+BU+4P9E2z+nJAxOEY2ZtB/pLJ/ exSzE5lQx6iM+q5uloCdwM1t3ljUG4UlHUVla5HrNA/mb1w7j+bXEWbdQ9UOcyukfCct STXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533J7WyG+VkiUsfnEA6Gm2fk4dr32aEWBy09SNW81brr9OH7/kDO sOuw4jzoH+ppbVpqk5aD/exgQntxleWZNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZSWT+yjabCy0YBdfyepG0XYzrc2uOo6V5QifBLnUPdGcy7HPO7RDeNemN2GUjPSNmdYc9YA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d5d5:: with SMTP id g21mr18009273edj.41.1607294404725; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:40:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([66.205.71.3]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm9396181ejx.59.2020.12.06.14.40.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:40:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ft4jaskj.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195184 Archived-At: On 06.12.2020 16:59, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> ...which is officially "discouraged" and doesn't work with company-capf. >> >> semantic-completion-at-point-function >> nxml-completion-at-point-function > These two no longer exist? > >> message-completion-function > This was reworked in 47a767c24e9cc4323432e29103b0a2cc46f8f3e4 in 2019, > so I'm not sure whether this is an issue any more? (I'm a bit vague > about how the completion system actually works.) > >> The last one also pops up a BBDB buffer upon successful completion (when >> BBDB is used, of course), so fixing it might need some additional effort >> to keep BBDB integration from breaking. > Is this still an issue after the 2019 rewrite of the function? Looks like these functions have all been "fixed" indeed. Thanks for the bump, closing!