From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8964: 24.0.50; `find-file' triggers the debugger when called with a nonexistent remote file Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309459840 23602 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 18:50:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8964@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 20:50:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcMJs-0003Vj-HX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:50:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcMJr-0006et-Nf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:50:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLY0-00018n-CS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLXz-0001ns-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLXy-0001nn-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLXy-0000yF-1U; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8964 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8964-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8964.13094568151624 (code B ref 8964); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 18:00:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLXC-0000Q1-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLX9-0000Cr-C5 for 8964@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43103) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcLX2-0005Py-TA; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:05 -0400 X-Spook: top secret military DRM INS JUWTF Honduras Nazi Uzbekistan X-Ran: %=PIM\@&y9IjzTL+ua]OXe.7Y{F^x\)u/Ecw~4I5x&x_w9$~h!8gVDE#j^lW[e"q*6kYxB X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:29:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47643 Archived-At: Dani Moncayo wrote: > How is it possible? I.e., why "C-h v" gives a different value than "M-:"? > > And why "M-: debug-on-error RET" returns `t' even after doing (setq > debug-on-error nil)? Because of eval-expression-debug-on-error, I think.