From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56815: 29.0.50; Isearch lazy-highlight highlights too much when truncate-lines is in effect Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:26:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83mtct87ti.fsf@gnu.org> <865yjhc85k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83fsik8o39.fsf@gnu.org> <87r124kul6.fsf@gnus.org> <86mtcrpyzs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bkt77nf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a68r7m2d.fsf@gnu.org> <837d3v7kr9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 56815@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 22:27:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWZk-0001v4-Ee for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 22:27:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53574 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWZj-0000Xy-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWZa-0000Wt-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWZZ-0003n2-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWZZ-00011M-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56815 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56815-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56815.16591263673850 (code B ref 56815); Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56815) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2022 20:26:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWYh-000102-7c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:58232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHWYc-0000ze-HT for 56815@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:26:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1659126361; bh=jAqm6CAWy3xVQ1SFqwusRfVfTQs9zOCBNEKI3umLzOQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=aeY6HVAZXEj6I4DfcexTpyLyLgU4ljTCw0pWayrSjPx5pJ1727+D0apJMLInnxYXz VFehajNInxg+0lHL27S8Uxzku++whe5fGlfIw93APVGIyfPf9fSjdmRbHFBa0sOvx7 qqEFr/CnJpp4s84Ds1w0viIqjpb4+FXY26DHeEYIRpd5u3R3PS2Ugqx1XV6IIzPTx3 yc5F8yPjqpA8ctEEoHhRz1DAMJixlpg7uuqToEHRJF+RIMBmPADp+QWiRm3VTga0TK uqpmlPenGnNHZRuAnhp4dQZzk6QLuvYNGzY5EgYE+IP6DiDcGh4t20JEA+fnorwtcJ r2wGnb9y+oDCw== In-Reply-To: <837d3v7kr9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238223 Archived-At: > > And yes, if we want truncate-lines to work reasonably well, we need to > fix any features which behave silly in that display mode. > If we want truncate-lines to work reasonably well without fixing all such features one-by-one, we need to fix the root cause of that dysfunction, which is not inside these individual features, but is the fact that (- (window-end) (window-start)) is huge. > > We will not remove truncate-lines from Emacs, and we will not make it > dysfunctional. > Nobody is asking or suggesting to remove truncate-lines from Emacs, or to make is dysfunctional. Admitting that it doesn't work together with long lines, which has always been the case, is something entirely different. But I feel you will tell me that I'm pressuring you, so I bow out of this discussion.