From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45688: 28.0.50; New action for display-buffer? Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:11:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87im8a1dff.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2h6133r.fsf@gnu.org> <8735ze0yp7.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8i20w1f.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfd5yny9.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8i03gem.fsf@gnus.org> <528b7d6b-403a-ffef-b0a0-4a0b6d92bec8@gmx.at> <87turpvxv0.fsf@gnus.org> <87turnh6u8.fsf@gnus.org> <87im83cn02.fsf@gnus.org> <568151d0-c8fd-1643-56a7-87ff36ce234d@gmx.at> <878s8psj2l.fsf@gnus.org> <874kjbr2i6.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6940"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45688@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 18:13:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H2Y-0001fU-20 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:13:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H2W-0000yh-Tg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H1X-0000ud-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H1W-0006UJ-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H1W-0002JB-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45688.16111627178862 (code B ref 45688); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 17:11:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H1R-0002Is-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:11:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:47565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2H1O-0002Ie-HH for 45688@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:11:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1611162708; bh=42OVo0wpjMNQlkrLH93rwmVPLo8htUJj3asbKpsE+B8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=F72Azm1ZJHiX4PrU/493aGGupAnbJaQMvnKK0vVZv9g4NsF5Chg/mkokcWEs2AVt9 7Yxl6LVvEKGIXyLjmmXiSZ3U+80XdZv5VY+e4BpRKhk5lhG8sgu7owrpfIEeJnzEGI eAdrrgv7zRlxoGcfhuRihb7ugO4CEYjTrVYSuI9M= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.241]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEFzx-1lCPVR0709-00AFPf; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:11:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874kjbr2i6.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QZQPYtEzUpAQLNhtjYkq9032WV/UgaMeWhhP6nLTT2Xgr3oXI+M sgQHb7pJxLn6ohtuvzcWtmTqrwKzcVZut51B7QzglgT+67HyAbxsHQYmDPkahJBA7sM9KNT SGHEeroGBEgASVNUKEcRWEMm23elCFphTyHtjjCKV3H4xY1VIn5sy5GHvyKhpB6dDwdLsjU 5cXcbtre0SKZ6Kqj9pSKw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:j+EfXk6mgUc=:BdNayiIpfuPJB5np/QWB8v B7KKghMkeICEMoAOhnXZdgHpyc/es/EIvJ4bIJpLuEFqlPx3IRdsJG2nex5roW+1Qdpuy9/34 vlfUqUDQC9c75buJte2EZRLPBJYsIvd/RdRZ/kbVwaAlwApdo6AqyPcJBkT++eRb9YrjcAn93 jn4A7QRxd6fB/eFGYM2IxV16l5Y8g5PIk4sWGeeEvD+eOkenc46l8wQpTkOmcPB2lG3ZXwSNk lmkrBhhlQ6zQzWJCzryiYcGOpBcY8Xj6au8v6Y7FQuE8IWGCf/jkDqME06Fm5OrajTSYtdgIX H5AyYrqfUNizNMurSwq7ppGsT6mmm/PEP6/xdJdeLz1YNJ7A+VnZENTuAGviMpm0V1a2JujPh C0NXaRypkO2D2N68+C/AyobLvAmcVKVaQRIAnSt+Z76p0fZk13SP28Z35kwyI784X0Ly1ZtRL +HFlZ070pJA5iWbP8IL8BWd5CotSsIuBuFyeukJPDeAy+GdlXm6+iVKhToJHr3t93uk1t4i2H bOf/2mPg2O3qVFfJeSVmeDjZaCuz0sY+Rss0hbFYE76FjWLHu/8ZY9T3QhXuqVx0H6ecYlNJS 263No/hws1FUersuvEaccupRSzf9wEu8ieVrWSp7I/TfbM2bhXIVkF6C6kp51QeLExKxbgFPL z1jRHlf/QxbL/lL7HAiEW24Ha7ENmMk8UaNclAfrH7M1F47sC/ucJYr4DIjxsMZ8KD6b7G0xK ipk/Qv1R4bNExbueMmN6BsFxBhg9eEpqVfSW8seBI5N+GYGhWQWODPC9yafMqbc1upr32tvm X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198283 Archived-At: >> Where and how? If you do that in the minibuffer window alone, you >> should get a result not affected by 'select-window'. Otherwise, all >> bets are off. > > `C-x C-e' :-) With emacs -Q, do C-x 2 twice so you get three windows (since you don't want to count the selected one) at least and do C-x C-e in the selected window with point after the following form: (let ((lru (get-lru-window (next-frame) nil t))) (window-bump-use-time lru) (message "%s .. %s" lru (get-lru-window (next-frame) nil t))) martin