From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John ff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34252: 27.0.50; rmail-get-new-mail fails Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:34:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8106-Tue29Jan2019205719+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> <5k1in9e55.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83a7ji0y9h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----LMTG881GKRLRKG199CKKIF1XHRLUJ6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="42897"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Android Cc: 34252@debbugs.gnu.org, john To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 30 20:36:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1goved-000Az2-SY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:36:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goveb-0002KQ-M6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goveV-0002KL-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:36:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goveU-00049i-5A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goveU-00049R-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1goveT-00046e-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John ff Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34252 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34252-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34252.154887693415748 (code B ref 34252); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34252) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2019 19:35:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51929 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gove1-00045w-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.155.197.248] (port=50688 helo=codemist.co.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1govdz-00045n-Qi for 34252@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:35:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [172.16.4.29] by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1govdy-0003gM-Gt; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:35:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83a7ji0y9h.fsf@gnu.org> X-Referenced-Uid: 8493 Thread-Topic: Re: bug#34252: 27.0.50; rmail-get-new-mail fails X-Is-Generated-Message-Id: true X-ACL-Warn: No reverse lookup X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154900 Archived-At: ------LMTG881GKRLRKG199CKKIF1XHRLUJ6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Will try soon =E2=81=A3Sent from TypeApp =E2=80=8B On 30 Jan 2019, 18:58,= at 18:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 = 18:10:29 +0000 (GMT) >> From: john >> Cc: 34252@d= ebbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg >> >> This could be due to a kernel/NFS problem but te = effect on using >rmail for >> my user-base is a real problem=2E The probl= ems with proto being nil in >> rmail-remote-proto-p is clearly wrong and de= spite your statement it >does >> happen to me on two diffrent computers/us= ers attempting to read mail >in >> emacs via rmail=2E > >If you leave only= the one change in the place where Glenn said proto >could be nil, and reve= rt the changes in the other two places, does the >problem still happen to y= ou? > >Thanks=2E ------LMTG881GKRLRKG199CKKIF1XHRLUJ6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Will try soon

Sent from TypeApp =
On 30 Jan 2019, at 18:58, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> wr= ote:
 Date: Wed, 30 =
Jan 2019 18:10:29 +0000 (GMT)
 From: john <jpff@codemist=2Eco=2Euk>=
;
 Cc: 34252@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg
 
 This could be due to a kernel/=
NFS problem but te effect on using rmail for 
 my user-base is a real pr=
oblem=2E  The problems with proto being nil in
 rmail-remote-proto-p is =
clearly wrong and despite your statement it does 
 happen to me on two d=
iffrent computers/users attempting to read mail in 
 emacs via rmail=2E<=
br>

If you leave only the one change in the place where Gle=
nn said proto
could be nil, and revert the changes in the other two plac=
es, does the
problem still happen to you?

Thanks=2E
------LMTG881GKRLRKG199CKKIF1XHRLUJ6--