From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40845: SVG rendering issues Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:24:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <72ebf5eb-6b00-ebb4-dab3-a047e35ae1ae@gmail.com> <83mu6z7em5.fsf@gnu.org> <17307310-2afc-7941-8a48-5cd345d1ad63@gmail.com> <83k1237b2a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="101111"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: 40845@debbugs.gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 19:25:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOYG-000QDc-CI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 19:25:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41640 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOYF-00027A-0J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOY2-00026t-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOY2-0004fk-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOY1-0004fe-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOY1-0008K5-It for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40845 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40845-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40845.158783546231943 (code B ref 40845); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40845) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2020 17:24:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOXO-0008J8-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:24:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]:35095) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSOXN-0008Ix-45 for 40845@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id s30so10751565qth.2 for <40845@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wYtcbL8SXKmIfmTEDlJTXmKFW7tMHAXCKKZiQJu4X9w=; b=oxdnTcUQfkLlCBhbh4kKUyy8W+sPMlZfi/OGdrps4WvObcP+PErlq36Pd5u1xsU6aI UBqx81bd0IzOUmJL5xBv50rau+4bYDuDY61Na7rWEbSYHxDTp+mFZ5bK/wcRH8T4p33o ZJbW2pVIHh2gBQrYDnI5BXr84FvqfwMKhFVnTuCkNNKkLUP8+6oGNAu4zKNribtUUcU1 +NlNounSgo9d8KCFQjK7E8CR7yTqqS0lkrZxoXheiR4W8jAVxWF1BbtLj6qFGNxBifKe BP/Y/aY9Kf6kRs0eVswD0kTMmx1WoizwOJEu4Dhnt4kNI3lSYpuKkRhzv2Ka0ZN2MekG IIPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wYtcbL8SXKmIfmTEDlJTXmKFW7tMHAXCKKZiQJu4X9w=; b=bHu95TSh4hOAqvAOHEZzEy+etPzjrXzQPmg7aBdGqEDxUPefZbyTQDGzryg96O1oSv YUej95yYkB+Rgg8R2ogXqvw5L/gIkS4fN3co1F1icibBeZZhxW8uhHCJFKJJEXR6ci3x 4NBbqgIJpDs3818g/J80aawFmsWw+lUDjoUY/QI0G7Gm2VUhZ0G5dPyW8KdNNqE58oX3 UToZK0uG3YsJPiYLowodYuWrbTsFYo4PiHqWGI7U6TDKyW/kRj25yIw+tD1Y3g3Ec2V8 4gN6+Y/NDmKT3R2j5w3aCsdzhzDz1+xVJnzu3/AofvQyfLM5CvtT9eYR8FSE+mNU4L71 cX2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuadgZqEkZLbXt4HTBhPyJVu8BSj1GLlu5bHn7eiMkoJsk2rEHwR hwMFy2qgT0Jb3wu1Fyq57CmJZU90Ums= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIibT8TT6J1yjmMB8S3X3ZjgVmSEQAT06Zj4EuObssgPtvT1XP6g7gzn1FluAKPlOZ9IfmeOg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:34b2:: with SMTP id w47mr15545801qtb.271.1587835455590; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:54d6:bfeb:aa49:9d3b? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:54d6:bfeb:aa49:9d3b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o67sm6113552qkc.2.2020.04.25.10.24.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:24:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k1237b2a.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179018 Archived-At: On 25/04/2020 13.02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > IMO the foreground of an image shouldn't be affected by the > current face's foreground. Images should come with their own colors, > and be displayed like that. I think in the context of the discussion > that led to this bug report it's actually almost a must: we want > images with attractive colors to serve as the icons, we don't want > them to be affected by whatever face happens to be nearby. Yes, of course: if an image has a foreground color, it should be respected. But it's not uncommon for SVG images to not include a foreground color, as shown in the repro. In that case, the image should use the current foreground color, I think. (of course, a :foreground keyword, if any, should take precedence; that is issue 4).