From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:25:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83a9e1wg93.fsf@gnu.org> <52F68E36.7070204@gmx.at> <83zjm1uz1g.fsf@gnu.org> <7fiospwd6u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y51luxxc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391901962 28604 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 23:26:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16691@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 00:26:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHk-0003eA-IB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:26:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHj-0002IH-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHg-0002I1-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHf-0002Lq-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHf-0002Lm-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHHe-0000lH-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16691.13919019212873 (code B ref 16691); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 23:25:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHGy-0000kG-1S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHGu-0000k6-ME for 16691@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCHGt-0003ul-ST; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:25:15 -0500 X-Spook: Cocaine enemy of the state Chobetsu Armani NORAD ARPA X-Ran: J?FU~$ROsiB?H7s}H8iR>:Mz:>8CBLSSgkY;sg?aJ4]B169`VRj)C!U:c`%BqyB,)*LS$P X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83y51luxxc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:55:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85003 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > (Why does this deserve a discussion? A few messages bounced, so > what?) OK, fine, keep confusing everyone who replies to you. > If you ask me, this all stems from the fact that debbugs is less > helpful than it could have been. It could, for example, be smarter > about merging, and it could take commands from messages addressed to > NNNN@debbugs.gnu.org, not just control@. If you want to solve these > problems, that's the only sure way. I disagree, and since no-one but me does any work on debbugs.gnu.org, I would not expect anything to happen in this area.