From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65356: 30.0.50; [wishlist] Support Tramp method, user name and host name completion in eshell Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:30:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87r0o1r1io.fsf@gmx.de> <4b4a64de-846a-ed2a-f409-80ea75e9cb57@gmail.com> <87il9crgqh.fsf@gmx.de> <87bkf4r2xd.fsf@gmx.de> <875y5cqt9a.fsf@gmx.de> <87zg2m9b4u.fsf@gmx.de> <87wmxq7zoq.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1896"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65356@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 23 02:31:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbmE-0000Nq-Th for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 02:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbm4-0001uv-5p; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYblz-0001sb-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYblz-00012T-G1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYbm2-0008IG-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65356 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65356-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65356.169275064931859 (code B ref 65356); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2023 00:30:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYblp-0008Hl-AF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]:61914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYblo-0008HX-5m for 65356@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-68a4025b5e8so2268261b3a.3 for <65356@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:30:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692750639; x=1693355439; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M5307+EHkLHSMIGS5/gztCmUfdbxkOe/tehOVmgnURM=; b=EHCMOXHogHztwQIueXZS0oqWMCfCr0ayPeSvUSdqDx8/aaccjSRrlbTeCsd0GS70bt xyQEFkdZaWRkB/ZS3FwIngnaCk/HohpuXapLfY2Y/wC+qELT7Rf4ROQuxAnEp4OvmR5f jRLAUCkgYLfhWZPOvShb2ttUbG0QIKi+nG7VSeJhk+L2+qSkZxDb4SMjz7bN4SFIXOK3 g5FC14zH4u/2OTessAaYkc+q2G4KhPrH2lchFJ1B75LxuGg4jOk5AXBq+Kgl73Icqezo fceaIADcCAwVjjklq5+EqUJBOcNrpp/0UMQEAovn9MgnaFtV3DhS1bRkzPBTyXsvBOha aEPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692750639; x=1693355439; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M5307+EHkLHSMIGS5/gztCmUfdbxkOe/tehOVmgnURM=; b=FG9tMRv9XPGOovp7KK3hn2D2lCUuqX8ZfmouMKbVYOQfXYaVXjn1ecPKrqB4ZLsdRR iYRYgSmk4dbcjyxVz0tLZeNjEcsyPR1qzw5pmbDzOov+NEfslkP3rV5r3u2I9Pw+KPVO 4qcHc6SIyEFZ5t4lbmYnMwewm2FziKm+HToNa9WaHeBVQXMF1V7nFWwM7I8zrTwhYlHK yA7Aan1cwK2qycH1ANxB+3UBHkciszLaNY8UPHuIA42mSODUQxRLB3GKR91k7F0cjIo2 Bvbghh0JBWOyMcYSFsYzUj3SyNAIomczDayGZunrRVmIx5KXFsao30r7ElApy2HAFgcn eTow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx2EC5bDtqv7AOLmYb73aVwWYzNXKkZWT68cSQmhocdOzuT9ZvM pDTgJdHcU6qCPRcpmSCRy7E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqltum9XDvxOsNVoq0zRQMRQ/V0HF1zrZqDQBae7X1I2Vm0Im4RvpHt4Zgv8Tkw6U3w44mhQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:ce84:b0:148:5933:30c9 with SMTP id if4-20020a056a20ce8400b00148593330c9mr7652166pzb.32.1692750638860; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c15-20020a170903234f00b001bc676df6a9sm9583210plh.132.2023.08.22.17.30.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87wmxq7zoq.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268194 Archived-At: On 8/20/2023 3:53 AM, Michael Albinus wrote: > As POC, I've written the appended patch. It works for me in a simple > case, but I'm pretty sure it needs to handle more cases. Since I'm not > so familiar with Eshell, I let it to you :-) > > ... unless you say it is sufficient ATM. Let's just go with the change to add 'pcomplete-remote-file-ignore' for now. I'll have to think more about how Eshell can selectively ignore remote files correctly in all cases; there are a bunch of areas where Eshell could be smarter about completion already, and I have the feeling they'll conflict with each other if we don't plan this out carefully...