From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63967: 28.2; switch-to-buffer in normal window fails if minibuffer window is active Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 20:04:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83o7lo28e6.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz241rgy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: al@petrofsky.org, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 63967@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 09 22:05:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iMO-0005D6-KU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 22:05:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iMC-0000OA-Ac; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iM3-0000Np-Si for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iM2-00055B-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iM2-0006u5-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 20:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63967-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63967.168634108626482 (code B ref 63967); Fri, 09 Jun 2023 20:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63967) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2023 20:04:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iLl-0006t0-Dk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:37712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q7iLj-0006sn-GD for 63967@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:04:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1686341082; bh=NDYCi0dOB3JIHHTu1OrgkAFCjnKAJZirZplzwB21H1I=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=iTG1HkCMorFUF3XFhGvVqxyLVxOjG8CquvKJalPzMjusXopwHbfLmXj2kZ1bMVLlX ZRtxeKt6TyzIYZPfxK63E6zZzngTzgGFVWUFR3+TCm/e4W0Lnwddt2KhMC4bG+af5M HPcAa08wrcXKU9S0cIS7Yb8UNEEmIRw5xUssT7bZKZmLLUyWqHc+DWhRlp13d7142m CCQ1MTUI8sdi5OB27LRRTsquFx8oCmJu5ho22nVi3ZRM1qM1hjdGl7gbO2lCDbLd4c yEJuEq1Hm+pY+9UNXI27pMl7/6EYo7dt9qEfZHfyejhQ89o4LAmt6GaxoLwJXaLgBh /X0/Idq67RU6w== In-Reply-To: <83cz241rgy.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:263187 Archived-At: >>> I couldn't find the offending change >> >> It's 7c2ebf6e23. > > Thanks. Yes, I imagined it would be it. Which is why I said: it won't > help us to know which commit changed that. > Given your last post, apparently it did help ;-)