Hi Eli, See inline. On 12/10/17 09:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc:27647@debbugs.gnu.org,jonaswestlund101@gmail.com, >> npostavs@users.sourceforge.net >> From: Romanos Skiadas >> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 21:32:06 +0100 >> >> echo "foo" > /tmp/test.txt >> >> (cd /tmp && git clonehttps://github.com/emacs-evil/evil) >> >> Add this to a file, eg /tmp/test-init.el: >> >> (add-hook 'text-mode-hook (lambda () (display-line-numbers-mode))) >> (add-to-list 'load-path "/tmp/evil") >> (require 'evil) >> (evil-mode 1) >> >> emacs -Q -l /tmp/test-init.el /tmp/test.txt >> >> Put this in the test.txt buffer an eval it: >> (let ((overlay (make-overlay 1 6 nil t nil))) ;; flyspell does this on misspelled words >> (overlay-put overlay 'help-echo "a")) >> >> Make sure you are in normal more (press ESC) >> Move the mouse above the f at the start of the buffer and hover until the "a" shows up. >> Click and drag along toward to end of the line. The line numbers consistently go away with this recipe for me. > Doesn't happen here with the latest emacs-26 branch. Are you using > that branch, or are you using some other code base for Emacs? I used Emacs26@078fb7f6df4178d5a35243dad164cdd196392e71 > (I didn't clone the evil Git repository; instead, I downloaded a zip > archive and unpacked it on my system. I don't think it should > matter.) As long at that is the latest evil, which is what I tested with, that shouldn't matter > Can you tell the details of your build? If it's a GTK build, does the > problem go away if you tell Emacs to use non-GTK tooltips (by setting > x-gtk-use-system-tooltips to nil), or if you turn off scroll-bar-mode? > It is indeed a GTK3 build and setting x-gtk-use-system-tooltips to nil does indeed make this problem go away. I've set it to nil on my init file for now. The list of configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL LIBSELINUX GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 LCMS2 >> I'll start dissecting evil to see what causes this. > Thanks.