From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59381: Should xref--marker-ring be per-window? Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86leo6ai85.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83leo67mbt.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk66r17.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1s54jmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0xx4hb1.fsf@gnu.org> <864jus4y3b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8567"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Ackerley Tng , 59381@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 04:17:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2jj-00021Z-Rt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 04:17:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2jZ-0003XG-FO; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2jX-0003Wh-3A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2jW-00049g-I5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2jV-00030X-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59381.166925977711503 (code B ref 59381); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2022 03:16:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2in-0002zT-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:38669) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oy2ij-0002zC-3n for 59381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:16:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id n3so597102wrp.5 for <59381@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:16:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JUNTkZ7ORc61k1fDlO9x+w3WK7e+MCRcHR4pvHcs3lU=; b=ZojZYqmmnArr62yP22nhAqebEzOIeN/E3V0sdgt5naEr3vAwkVAfF+YDd37EXK76JQ 90sNNe/L+vl6/nBjyhI5aWaKX8X0RMuNvgvM/XwBkBdkScpAWPy3+OKaIWgs6zJL5zwl EZDutNsvubSrMwLQvPJJJCen2BwaVXEnO5HNZ/mrbmjMXLFfnasF59THAP9axwTQ/+3P nU9pvoqvZiivgjUOKoumfCA9ynIjfNsqqlsTRQnAwY1ONU80U9dupZcTTU9nku3EtaEn B2IARUCvFz6xfvlJBe3ga2i6re5MxP1XHEy5XbHxQMWTOtyorjY2oUUopttMt5NXxaE2 q82A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JUNTkZ7ORc61k1fDlO9x+w3WK7e+MCRcHR4pvHcs3lU=; b=1yRb9AC7T1BXkjwFHzntbQU++7FjYz1sTxhV91bpq0Sbv83WExuLJUdt1esFxH9qek bjEKB3SfauyCbdcOi4FTPLw4XcnmAOlnISXZAq+w+XBBK2CZAKEvO7PYkmRhUGinOC7f XoC/v2gqIkeyCGfmmsbyhJmwN1jDibWRDryDl+swiZNSVUSYRuz16No+A7uPwbv3YObE mp6Ze5DayoEjKvyClsl81HwSm86o6WPfoKXScC6hF1ETO5vbNyyZCosytE3kcIbyUxpT oKJyGnCem0a9asUd7w3069SSCKrtKv9DaDrVFS4D+Rud9MrbYRn+gByAcf1DNC6E8R+Y RFRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnGLwYsrVzuRbzDD4OMjPIfV+LTj14Muox06hedWoM+bPs5q/qm +JIwzTLmhjIuZxkmnpMw4NU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4JiXhBB+4pBf/kbJxO9oSijiUDChg/oRyDi5Dw5loylToTYgJG94Ynozd96ollBD2Xg3UYBQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8c7:0:b0:241:ea28:c4aa with SMTP id k7-20020adfe8c7000000b00241ea28c4aamr4105213wrn.81.1669259766962; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:16:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l22-20020a05600c4f1600b003cffd3c3d6csm194024wmq.12.2022.11.23.19.16.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:16:06 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <864jus4y3b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248804 Archived-At: On 21/11/22 09:42, Juri Linkov wrote: >>>> What does everyone think if we do the baseline of just creating a new >>>> stack per-window (no copying) and then waiting to see if we get >>>> feedback once people start using it? >>> If this is optional and can be disabled, I don't think I mind. >> >> Definitely optional, we should provide different "storages" for >> this. Global (the current behavior), per-window, per-frame, maybe others. > > Also per-project (maybe even by default). I don't know whether I like that as default: some navigations could jump across projects, it would be weird to break the stacks along those boundaries. > PS: this whole subject of different xref stacks reminds me > trying to make sense of the different next-error stacks ;-) Definitely. ;-)