From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31446: 26.1; sql-interactive-mode buffer naming is broken Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:32:01 +1200 Message-ID: References: <8336yoiuf4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0xpf47n.fsf@gnu.org> <83fu2jej5t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527636676 26590 195.159.176.226 (29 May 2018 23:31:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 23:31:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: 31446@debbugs.gnu.org, Filipp Gunbin , bug-gnu-emacs To: Michael Mauger Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 30 01:31:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo57-0006lk-Fk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 01:31:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo7E-00072S-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo70-000717-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo6w-0003yy-Kb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46536) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo6w-0003yl-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo6w-0001y4-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 23:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31446 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31446-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31446.15276367327491 (code B ref 31446); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31446) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2018 23:32:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo68-0001wl-Ba for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-1.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.34]:37740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo65-0001wb-Kn for 31446@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=46980 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-1.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo5x-000284-SP; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:32:01 +1200 Original-Received: from wlgwil-nat-office.catalyst.net.nz ([202.78.240.7]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 30 May 2018 11:32:01 +1200 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146721 Archived-At: On 2018-05-30 02:36, Michael Mauger wrote: > I realize that 26.1 has been released, so my changes obviously won't > make it. I have a version of the package with vastly improved and > consistent buffer naming but I want to now test it more heavily. If it's in a state where some help with testing would be useful, perhaps you could push the new code to a separate branch? (My own availability is rather patchy for the next 2-3 weeks, but I should be able to give it a decent whirl over the next few days, and maybe others can too?) cheers, -Phil