Hi Aaron,

Thanks for the report.

On 16/12/2022 07:04, Aaron Jensen wrote:
> 
> Currently, ruby-mode smie indents method parameters like this:
> 
> def some_method(
>      some_arg,
>      some_other_arg
>    )
> end
> 
> def self.some_method(
>        some_arg,
>        some_other_arg
>      )
> end

I'm assuming the difference in indentation between these posted cases is 
just an email/bug tracker bug. If they are sometimes different, please 
let me know. That would be another bug.

> I would prefer to be able to indent them like this:
> 
> def some_method(
>    some_arg,
>    some_other_arg
> )
> end
> 
> def self.some_method(
>    some_arg,
>    some_other_arg
> )
> end

See the attached patch. (setq ruby-method-params-indent 0) should do it.

> Rubocop has two rules that govern this behavior:
> 
> Layout/FirstParameterIndentation: consistent
> https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/1.40/cops_layout.html#layoutfirstparameterindentation
> 
> Layout/ParameterAlignment: with_first_parameter and
> with_fixed_indentation would both work. I don't have a strong opinion on
> this, because I usually break after a ( if I am going to put parameters
> on their own line. Leaving the first one on the same line as the method
> name is not as scannable.
> https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/1.40/cops_layout.html#layoutparameteralignment

All right. It doesn't seem to support many styles, only indenting the 
first param against the opening paren, and against the beginning of 
"def". But it confirmed my idea for the option name (a generic one).