From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45944: 28.0.50; Mailabbrev sometimes hangs Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 06:50:15 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <87o8hlpm7b.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeihqqg5.fsf@igel.home> <874kjdj74n.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 45944-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cancel-Lock: sha1:cjwJrZNIIC1RlgEs/BCDDEkV+io= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 22:51:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1yuS-000723-0l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:51:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1yuR-00059o-0f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:51:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1yty-000590-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1yty-0002ik-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1yty-0006OG-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45944 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 45944-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45944.161109303424529 (code D ref 45944); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45944-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2021 21:50:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1ytR-0006NU-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:50:34 -0500 Original-Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]:17938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1ytM-0006NG-0H for 45944-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:50:27 -0500 X-Sender-Id: tih5qno0ow|x-authuser|yamaoka@cloud1.hostforweb.net Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839CB482CF0; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from cloud1.hostforweb.net (100-96-45-5.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.45.5]) (Authenticated sender: tih5qno0ow) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BE565482821; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:50:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: tih5qno0ow|x-authuser|yamaoka@cloud1.hostforweb.net Original-Received: from cloud1.hostforweb.net (cloud1.hostforweb.net [154.16.119.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/6.0.1); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:50:22 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: tih5qno0ow|x-authuser|yamaoka@cloud1.hostforweb.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: tih5qno0ow X-Harmony-Daffy: 32e16cc85dac322f_1611093022306_1227699478 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1611093022306:1115679245 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1611093022306 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.org; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Message-ID:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xFhZWI05kwJoHfIjVLAAMyth7SN58FOjc8S96EozPnI=; b=Akq6EeQKDhSSRCqiFVH2mUqT00 C+vHdjHtIMJm793FmyjnBqe91EcgSFoLCY/toswmxSbfPxk/KUio31T0gRJIpMCFc37p/ZJ8AkMJ6 oZYonp0J32GRT6OzTJPa0ZHR5LBVZctK0Y5NcPbGiKn6Pfu3zmybNqMi4fUCu4mycpWdlFk4c8qHE RuMwqIx9x+Z1htjEqOiYg955I5UiZjatNEDZUQtlIjg1Rm2vj33Hi8boLdlngMDL7ook4XSWnT5yS pxv9ksVHdC3n/86y21r0PPP4sN5P/ZRZ1Qw6564B74wy4sk3njLjvUHwJZ1B07Ge4k7+wSLugTgm8 QpX8vljg==; Original-Received: from 113x33x36x204.ap113.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([113.33.36.204]:52598 helo=localhost) by cloud1.hostforweb.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l1ytI-00CCJ6-H9; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:50:20 -0500 X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( X-AuthUser: yamaoka@cloud1.hostforweb.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198211 Archived-At: On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:09:28 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I've now changed the function along these lines -- it now starts with > (defun message--syntax-propertize (beg end) > "Syntax-propertize certain message text specially." > (with-syntax-table message-mode-syntax-table > and this seems to fix the reported test case. Good! This fixes the problem that arises when manipulating the header of a reply message to the actual email I first found it. Thanks. Closing.