From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17069: Fixed Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395599700 4144 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2014 18:35:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 23 19:35:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEh-0006F4-RS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:35:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEh-00085n-Fr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEd-0007zn-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEc-0005GK-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEc-0005GD-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEc-0005KX-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17069 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17069-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17069.139559969320470 (code B ref 17069); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 18:34:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnES-0005K5-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEQ-0005Jx-82 for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEP-0005Ii-5b; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:49 -0400 X-Spook: Al Jazeera Qaddafi embassy SEAL Team 6 morse X-Ran: z@a>/Z5zW,d?82ulMJ{l]_rHQ?lp.v3tpn(y%X4BT{@GoR#cga/U6+/0.&xzkkta#L!E0_ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87244 Archived-At: In any case, can I again prod people to put Version: 24.5 (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages. Because otherwise when someone looks at http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17069 a year from now, they have a hard time figuring out which Emacs release the fix is supposed to be in.