From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: Fix the long lines font locking related slowdowns Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 16:49:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <831qtz3ot7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 19:10:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYvs-000AEP-7K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 19:10:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41512 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYvr-0004F8-3r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYcF-0003bj-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYcF-0001Ik-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYcE-0005jq-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.165937259922030 (code B ref 56682); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2022 16:49:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYcA-0005jF-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:34162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIYc8-0005j2-Tc for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:49:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1659372595; bh=7Rqqc2w0LH+4Xt/3KDsDogUOhaIXTHM+I3SOZEAz8+s=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=1Q5gJZWzhXOwNMImhYJlvIIVekiAcMp+Ew209O5wHLBmwoQIErr9r1xW5cIi9GINM auBWmXjvL3Ar4A1XWHzu6NFydKb44TbPlgyWHx1HFOMSlRikYW9ECo1iSkbJDaHf04 +h6Hl0ZUgnC23Df7ueJDKxz+gqV1Gba8Cgc6pFpZrsXZ66ISCHX/0rCZDbe6jQ2gTH HDU1r+4djvI8sCLqhUXx2Sff9PmGEAXK93ETkgadQXTULYB3g/sLx8SjVuEucqUGLQ VATKT6tV+GkfirKE4sveIkBNewHJRF9UR2JYeGUed/nAeqzNiifTyeCqddfhPRSdz0 qqL51lF3l7tMA== In-Reply-To: <831qtz3ot7.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238452 Archived-At: > > Can you explain which, if any, problems you saw or had in mind, and what > and how did you want to fix them with this particular hunk? I'd then > suggest a better change (or agree with your change, in case I missed > something). > You're correct, now that I think again about this, it was just wrong. Fixed.