From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57804: An infinite loop in a `fontify-region' function causes Emacs to hang indefinitely Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:44:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pmfx6h7y.fsf@gnus.org> <2b58b8f5429a6e3aecda@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32102"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 57804@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 15 18:45:27 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oYrzT-00089d-1S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:45:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYrzR-0007le-UO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYrz4-0007lC-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYrz4-0003kG-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYrz3-0007J0-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 57804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57804.166326028128041 (code B ref 57804); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 16:44:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYryj-0007ID-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:42800) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYryg-0007I2-N9 for 57804@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:44:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663260277; bh=629t19GFR04+as+AtH3BziyU+2lqrjNRjxpDkX2Bzb4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=FkGHkON1juV/0PujEF9i8faJ3qeNI/KlO8m+zdG/fE7jGv/l7Ga/vyIR6SBRmBhVV Fz6eegiLf9kKoblNRJjBuilza9oaoKr8YyMEHq3ug/OftJ+79XWn6iBrtU0iWK5rFk 3ZkiH5qpV9FHh2cJuyk3Jggg0BiJC1jDj7S1VlAmKbZ3G/xBYL3aHaW7Y8VzcqzjuN mC8GmlSQs7C+S+PI2g1u5POUgYC9T1dzE5FHdJKASrtKispgTTABoy+iG5AneJ6N6U zsgrGI6P5BQjNK/JhcyOn4Xj9l5m0KbPpATxt0cPf2xnGhHb5CTm4UGTzJG+cJ1hZM /PEkFTQAZR26g== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242617 Archived-At: > > My attitude is explained by my general experience with Emacs itself and > reporting any problems I have had with it. Sometimes everything went out > fine, but far less often than I would have hoped. > We're all doing our best to improve Emacs in our free time. It is unreasonable to expect that everything would go fine (with your own definition of "fine") in all cases. It would not be reasonable to expect that from a private company, either. > > You may see me as a jerk, > I do not. > > I suspect your "help" was to the tune of "instead, you should just...". > That's a rather strange conclusion. I already told you thrice that a simple way to fix your problem is to set long-line-threshold to a larger value (or to nil).