From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:11:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456496008 13085 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2016 14:13:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 6991-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 6991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 15:13:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8s-0002JC-JT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:13:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8r-0003z7-Uk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8l-0003wS-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8h-0003rK-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8g-0003rG-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ8g-0004Zd-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6991-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D6991.145649592717505 (code D ref 6991); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2016 14:12:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ7n-0004YC-7R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:46210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZJ7l-0004Xe-S3; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u1QEBxDb015295 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:11:59 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1QEBx3c029789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:11:59 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1QEBvQ2018994; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:11:58 GMT In-Reply-To: <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113884 Archived-At: Why is this bug classified as "Won't Fix"? Isn't this something we would all like to see fixed? Not fixing today does not mean that it should not be fixed. What's more, _users_ currently do the work by hand, so it must be possible to at least partly (probably fully) get it done by program. If users can manually (time-consuming and error-prone) redact the byte-code when pasting a backtrace into a mail etc. then that can be done by program. The fact that no one has done this yet is not a good reason to close this as "wont-fix".