From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: locked narrowing Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:11:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83zgg4dw4y.fsf@gnu.org> <83r11gdrr4.fsf@gnu.org> <83edxfds7s.fsf@gnu.org> <83r11fc80o.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7wjc6o2.fsf@gnu.org> <83lernc5gu.fsf@gnu.org> <83k076dd7d.fsf@gnu.org> <83czcyd8jf.fsf@gnu.org> <83a682d66r.fsf@gnu.org> <837d36ceno.fsf@gnu.org> <37dd2827f54f8bbda5e3@heytings.org> <735c1d5b-0d64-a8e1-3aaa-91fc0248abd3@yandex.ru> <97049541-f5b4-ed3b-b8de-7c0bdc86f0f5@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6879"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 29 21:13:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p06yl-0001XX-Gz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:13:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p06yV-0008Aw-LI; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p06yU-0008AV-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p06yT-0003Go-Ma for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p06yT-0006Kl-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.166975272324339 (code B ref 56682); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2022 20:12:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p06xW-0006KV-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:36660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p06xT-0006K8-VE for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:12:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1669752718; bh=TMZhZFB/b5sZk9sobYvP2W4kHbTpJdcc1b52nJ31Rmk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=IopkfZAgfkv3UVMiPdDKVVsA3L0bXQL1XfZx21FrY4vMWgfSVAKI1JNysAiaCEGjT C5ZPHwI58tGyDK3wWvulLL0xa8X3wdR8F4tihu7zujcb1lObRuM3O1gqtQtkqkYRaB J6v9k+D251ri4LChsI2/X4puy+kNTxKomW1epYB+arKnJmq/7dzdnAL+O9fWGaByya VlDT8iDrtV4m/eOTb8esdtxVQKUdIiNHrVNYliTolQCegAJOI+Cnj2Oh12/6K5gccx rdi9GdT+urPOHUyJSlwsGfrl5uPmG21BfawC/5bSdad9tfEmrfKjmmrHhcvaHHOWtr dDXtEeP3X5SxA== In-Reply-To: <97049541-f5b4-ed3b-b8de-7c0bdc86f0f5@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249432 Archived-At: >> - on current master, after C-s eman RET, I see ~100 ms, and after C-s > > Note the 100 ms. > >> aan zich RET, I see ~100 ms > > "eman" is near BOB for you as well, right? > It's the same file, so yes. >> - at ff57f30bee (30 July), after C-s eman RET, I see ~20 ms, and after >> C-s aan zich RET, I see ~2700 (!) ms >> >> - at c59b8dfefa (30 Jun), after C-s eman RET, I see ~20 ms, and after >> C-s aan zich RET, I see ~2700 (!) ms > > Note the 20 ms. > I did. >> - with Emacs 28, after C-s eman RET, I see ~20 ms, and after C-s aan >> zich RET, I see ~3000 (!) ms > > Yup, the long delays near EOB are expected, I fixed them in js.el not > too long ago (one in font-lock rules, and anothing by creating > js-json-mode). > So what? We had in that file 20 ms at BOB and 3000 ms at EOB, which means an average of 1500 ms (in that file). Now we have 100 ms at BOB and EOB, which means an average of 100 ms (in that file). How can that be a regression?