From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50944: malformed :safe entry in several defcustoms Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:27:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zgrpnniq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2528"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: 50944@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 17:29:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPu3-0000ST-JM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:29:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPu2-0005ar-1T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPsq-0004jy-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPsn-0005ge-Nd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPsn-0007K5-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50944 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50944-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50944.163336123328087 (code B ref 50944); Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50944) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2021 15:27:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPs1-0007Ix-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPrz-0007Ik-Um for 50944@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPru-0004vs-HR; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPrs-00088R-2l; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:27:04 -0400 X-Spook: Dock Egret Chan advisors Power outage Burst Armani Clinton X-Ran: \%^/qO/:wfYwn4a"IhZ~A0#-bnm&f+Sd<]~}QHHJ$Zl0+6v)k!/af'w@{R6CZ*-J\\=TjA X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87zgrpnniq.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:32:29 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216364 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Run-time warning seems easy: > > A compile-time warning would be nicer, I think. Please make a separate bug report for this (this one is closed). Or a patch. :) To be explicit, the failure mode causes the variable to not be considered safe, so it's not an important issue, and should be obvious if anyone actually tests their :safe property.