From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43572: Feature request: make it possible to choose whether the first lines of the minibuffer should be displayed instead of the last ones Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:34:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83h7rov7xy.fsf@gnu.org> <837dskuvx3.fsf@gnu.org> <833637uubc.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu1ftdkb.fsf@gnu.org> <83imc3tach.fsf@gnu.org> <83eemrt8da.fsf@gnu.org> <838scytk87.fsf@gnu.org> <835z82tdz9.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuvmrtpf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14407"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: 43572@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 25 13:36:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kLm1D-0003dC-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:36:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLm1C-0005h3-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLm0F-0004Vk-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLm0E-00006q-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLm0E-0003sX-I5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43572.160103366814863 (code B ref 43572); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2020 11:34:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLlzf-0003re-O6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:34:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:62767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLlzd-0003rW-Bw for 43572@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@otaku.sdf.org [205.166.94.8]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 08PBYOTG001887 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:34:24 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 08PBYesj026223; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:34:40 GMT In-Reply-To: <83tuvmrtpf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188959 Archived-At: >> And Stefan refers to bug#24293 and bug#39379, where the same problem >> (the prompt becomes invisible) is explained and workarounds are >> discussed. > > I disagree that it's the same problem. Part of what is described there > is the problem fixed in bug#43519, the other part is the intended > behavior. > Yet it is the same problem. The fact that these bugs use simple examples (presumably because their authors did not yet investigate the more complex cases) does not mean that their bug reports mean something else than what they clearly say: "the prompt is not visible". > > And I disagree, as explained above. So let's agree to disagree, because > these back-and-forth messages, where we both say the same things over > and over and over again, are already too many to be useful. > I agree to disagree. Please tell me when you and Stefan agree on a better / the best way to solve the current problem. I'll be silent till then.