From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41423: 27.0.91; eshell file completion in tramp dir is slow (3 minutes) [regression on pretest] Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:41:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <87mu2d7hka.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Michael Albinus , Eli Zaretskii , rrandresf@gmail.com, Tim Vaughan , 41423@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 01 18:09:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8qk-0008hg-1L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:09:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8qj-00067q-0H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8R5-0003wV-HU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8R4-0001Up-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8R4-00011h-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41423.15989749233879 (code B ref 41423); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2020 15:42:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8Q7-00010V-9s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61007) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD8Q5-000106-Fl for 41423@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 081Ffn8i001410 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:41:50 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 081FfxgJ028047; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:41:59 GMT In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186863 Archived-At: > > See for example patch below (which shouldn't be applied as-is since the > body of the function ends up misindented). > Indeed this patch works. But now my question is: whould it not be possible to do this (namely, returning a lazy completion table) in one of the pcomplete-* functions (in `pcomplete-completions-at-point' itself, or in `pcomplete-completions', or...), instead of doing this in the individual functions ultimately called by `pcomplete-completions-at-point'?