From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41423: 27.0.91; eshell file completion in tramp dir is slow (3 minutes) [regression on pretest] Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:14:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87imd175pf.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: rrandresf@gmail.com, Tim Vaughan , 41423@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 29 19:15:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4Rz-0002hv-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 19:15:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47758 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4Ry-0000W8-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4RS-00008S-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4RS-0003sj-Br for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4RS-000160-7n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41423.15987212504134 (code B ref 41423); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2020 17:14:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4Qc-00014c-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:57922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC4Qa-00014T-IL for 41423@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 07THE7Dv003446 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:14:07 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 07THE6Bm000802; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:14:06 GMT In-Reply-To: <87imd175pf.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186663 Archived-At: > >> I just checked, and see no visible improvement. > > The first time you try completion, there's no difference. The cache must > be filled. But all next times you complete, it shall be faster for > remote directoriues. > Yes, this is what I did. The first time there was no difference. The second time I did not see any difference either, alas. I just tried it again. > > I do not claim my patch is the solution. But it shall be useful, if > eshell-complete-commands-list is called somewhere. > A much better patch at this point is to just restore the previous default behavior (in Emacs 26 and earlier) by setting completion-at-point-functions to '(pcomplete t) instead of '(pcomplete-completions-at-point t), for example with: (add-hook 'eshell-mode-hook (function (lambda () (setq completion-at-point-functions '(pcomplete t))))) pcomplete is obsolete, but it is still there, and it works.