From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30190: 27.0.50; term run in line mode shows user passwords Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:26:48 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87r2qjh0fs.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv17nwe4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87efm259s5.fsf@gmail.com> <83vafe9f16.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517711135 31329 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2018 02:25:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 02:25:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 30190@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 04 03:25:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ei9zR-0006Sc-Eh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 03:25:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1Q-0005JP-IV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1J-0005IN-MQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1G-00038j-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1G-00038R-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1G-0003a0-6j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30190 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 30190-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30190.151771121913752 (code B ref 30190); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 02:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30190) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2018 02:26:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56130 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1D-0003Zj-3Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:44224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiA1B-0003ZW-SO for 30190@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id r1so334223pgn.11 for <30190@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JKJAJ0NdXU470a/iZCghMuXytbrflzqQjUbdKxAfmwA=; b=mi3jqcWDgwXO5F1Z+nclN7uYxEDLLJcW/WaVO7CKhJcgqlKhxcKDcD3EyFmrfNiw0L 8p5rusJqpUM+xuIv7fuh1Uh8yrjAQX37r3YbJtgBWAEZ9rL+ZSzXVGVkXFWAaa0afUWw ASA/KRk4jnQOHmF7MsbK5jsjKSUuZ0tVFnzGWMNkGTdQC4g9CX5AWBhOml7x5x0bkzNx 4jBg05xY6EOjOKxRYl5/UNkyhsDGoGe2kMkfju+kN/nfZRfjfJOS6Ss4sdQ4P/6QOAcP w1STFybj2mZfUHpnsM7q2jfziA5iN2BabcZiupK8kqUqrKaT9Z1tos4cJ9nuueT1i+j0 op7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JKJAJ0NdXU470a/iZCghMuXytbrflzqQjUbdKxAfmwA=; b=kbgz/GusU1BPHz7wbId6nMIluEagG41s2/XeeQh6Bd34Fes8BRur+/o6Xhv+0DrzwC dzR9NpH9zH2ydIW4nE/hTBXLxHR1ncwWWzu69Ts8I88m7NRZlyBVsbF2VQLzLL8pTdmh xZR+rXwdlPqXIRoMsok6kHHHZ5aTHmnyqmhr/XtZU7nAogQIvzrWD+uI7vwLfAOo5vL3 1YDQPDC66gB/UikWcqfEb8C6gunPLEDV8hCvqCnin3YB/WKL/GRI50mEwqfVIDSrTbq/ KqrPcv3Saz9mswQIw4YrvaNty6fGv5rluDZjSu7i/RMzDhKPM+FTOa0ObgeV03l+peCK sdgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfKR2lm7CCRmMwN29WhKpTroouYolsTh+l9mhxzcsfLvqiHs7P4 1HtZxrDLNHRjQ8BahNxx6t8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227FQcpISGm8+ZQmoKpNQt8Zd3Hjj0X2xWCIkfUtGavEvMLIlaz5e4Epchlpv0EVtcpz59HmEw== X-Received: by 10.98.66.67 with SMTP id p64mr44494128pfa.227.1517711212046; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:26:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (146.219.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.219.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p62sm10449076pfi.88.2018.02.03.18.26.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Feb 2018 18:26:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <83vafe9f16.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142873 Archived-At: On Sat, 3 Feb 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Tino Calancha >> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 01:15:54 +0900 >> Cc: 30190@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Noam Postavsky writes: >> >>> Yes, seems to have been the case for a long time, I can reproduce back >>> to 24.3 (oldest Emacs version I have running). >> This is a security risk. I would like to have it fixed ASAP. >> Below patch seems to work. Any feedback would be appreciated. > > My feedback is that such a radical solution with so many lines of code > is a no-no for the release branch. Please look for a simpler > solution, perhaps don't create a new file? OK, I will prepare one less verbose by today. I agree it would be nice to have it in the next release.