From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27979: tab completion for "(yes or no)?" Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:02:39 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87lgmxh6w5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87r2won9jc.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-1893628992-1502024562=:2084" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502024596 8890 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2017 13:03:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:03:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 27979@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 06 15:03:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1deLD2-0001tK-NV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:03:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33153 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deLD9-0008EO-1W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCz-0008Dx-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCw-0004CE-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCw-0004CA-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCw-0005WQ-5r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27979 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27979-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27979.150202457121211 (code B ref 27979); Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27979) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2017 13:02:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCk-0005W2-Vx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:34459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1deLCj-0005Vr-F4 for 27979@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:02:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id t86so6462824pfe.1 for <27979@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 06:02:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=fquqER7/52rl8XNkILwhCg7n9JpBXXTBgw5nVoGcxCg=; b=fZjvw3daINX9JriOhmesqm6j0/ZvUqMRoWKk+w9ak8N6NRHOwsbhdCMUK5PWTYegza G5yr7SBjTmuC0otGixg7FB3vCgkMz/PlouuOIhBPYqdod6Hr2xY3qfhLkKxobUlGxVuy 28usXLrLh0AOYK1+Tq00itpMejiG+Xv49UGUhEUUfEojAFyvQdzttpcUIEiJ4/rUoRed pwJ1PIggFz5mj81Junkro8fM57+gkkq+YY9qG5PblD7qGQBLjfGBD72TO+UwnPY9Onki /cy9lgdSVUSb6HG1PDxQ+MaUBJc9n8JPshlgU4ds2akR89A4duxt4LI9+5Q5OlFsp0Wc KUFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=fquqER7/52rl8XNkILwhCg7n9JpBXXTBgw5nVoGcxCg=; b=k8iTTipY+en6yt1LQv4T+o3BsoLxe5bepOV5hJ8MpKzlrg0Dw6FHfWfot9DmqlRv4Q c5/+1r84j3k0yBHhW+7jb7oqdvwfmIinjp9efKBfz7nGjLgOhsGr/10LzppKtgOMi+TU Bkd1eTjPBhtm4cacH1Jd/s9jXlK4Y4QFaLTsZfNNxG+a5ba8UUGSvp+AtX2URMV4lTzg NJ06mvTgvQlhchHP6QdzAeTPVTvUqHhFgJ+L8KmXw2FGkRi3RFl0hl7yuD3gQWVu9lzy CM4+5rxrbjo8SaqtRJOjE8UF80T6FJnN2cFreKKLyrta+HapR309UxtrY4Xnffetrlze 0ldg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110ksZXIY9Cr5rQ8HE800ouibqSFD5rM9IrOZ6tbqaAtiaLAwBWf 6cj8x03OCO8IYA== X-Received: by 10.84.217.208 with SMTP id d16mr10094370plj.208.1502024563456; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 06:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (170.224.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.224.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm12801984pfk.26.2017.08.06.06.02.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Aug 2017 06:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87r2won9jc.fsf@jidanni.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135489 Archived-At: --8323329-1893628992-1502024562=:2084 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-2022-JP On Sun, 6 Aug 2017, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >>>>>> "TC" == Tino Calancha writes: > TC> offering TAB completion would somehow contradict this idiom. > > Well I discovered for a second and subsequent yes, one can just hit the up arrow. What?? Oh noo! > (But I hope that is not now going to be removed too, now that I revealed it.) You should keep your secrets better :-). I already canceled the auto completion in the recursive deletion or dirs: now the full word is required. I must thank your this report, it opened my eyes about my previous mistake ;-) I really prefer that users input the full word when they are about to run such kind of commands: commands that might destroy months-years of someones work. --8323329-1893628992-1502024562=:2084--