From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26338: 26.0.50; Collect all matches for REGEXP in current buffer Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 00:29:35 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <8737dr6kxx.fsf@calancha-pc> <87h926cvgl.fsf@localhost> <87k272ow7g.fsf@calancha-pc> <87fuhpcbem.fsf@localhost> <87lgrheyvn.fsf@calancha-pc> <87pogsmefn.fsf@jane> <874ly3vw1p.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <943bd0fd-c4ad-48f4-a803-f832b5bf0edf@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491665419 17379 195.159.176.226 (8 Apr 2017 15:30:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 15:30:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 26338@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Marcin Borkowski , Tino Calancha , Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 08 17:30:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJU-0003ZU-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:30:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJZ-00043V-4p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJS-00042D-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJP-0004KY-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJP-0004J2-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJP-0003RG-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 15:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26338-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26338.149166538813172 (code B ref 26338); Sat, 08 Apr 2017 15:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2017 15:29:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJA-0003QO-DG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:33439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwsJ8-0003Q7-JK for 26338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 11:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x125so86198820pgb.0 for <26338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:29:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KzjI8OnVn6g8uwkja8dc4y4RfijwmHIlx7lGNzlUggk=; b=b7y6lt8DaaIe+RRGxkxzv9bGIz+tqxIDXNmUxD+0go8sAhmw0Ee4CBC1kZx7GCbgGA bU5lJUOcf/QH3ePrFmqM7KcSnIpMtF2RZuFmaEJiQVjC3MV+2+DtE7dnjEgNtWlBuVdh vLE5gCBmxEGCC0oWj5LKpQwyo6UPFutUCmkFrN/3XbkBvTwsMbbPMKe1C4sCBMIzK/hN UeUH/9hUWtAUtmk3GvlmtkbW313PEtywDFvDN5iqfW4jCNH8d2vwjMAZUVcFyoOf9+sI djFGyOgOTFXwvRLv+W7RJVhhNon9cR0awF09VKLtSrqz+jq4xkJCiRK/WiAy1cBuKpQk UgIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KzjI8OnVn6g8uwkja8dc4y4RfijwmHIlx7lGNzlUggk=; b=gdB+iS2KrA9FT+CymfaQ0qVQBXb+t3hRP4FzyGKkOKLqoHe5wPNvrLKYaU2dP4v4rg oWA90a0sj5suWEb2o/WFQVLjcpCVVgH4O72SZW25U8/JthGA61z7eioFb1/WfMm+ITRD Wh/1rh4Z191z41/crCamc02zraCNROVkScp8oPmhuOyARf+onQc6ykZ3DqCrW23F2pay ftG4JputUf5UL2bnk3Gjd5XeSxVBxCy1xMcT12hC+o/sbisPQr0BIMjL6QzGzbeskMDY ToTqGEjFTKvowL8ztYIRkuZBASvOyhDxCTLKvdjT7+gyMU3zsBORwKFmxiGTV4Sz1zSn YRjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3ZjR+7IcpuSnHVQVdIWkuphn84eNGfBHnenFM3ELHBbQAw6viMIx/PgkipPB3Q6A== X-Received: by 10.99.97.77 with SMTP id v74mr47199127pgb.76.1491665380742; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (222.139.137.133.dy.bbexcite.jp. [133.137.139.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v86sm15669439pfa.86.2017.04.08.08.29.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:29:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131374 Archived-At: On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Drew Adams wrote: > Put all this stuff - and more - into an `eloop' macro. > Since it will be so much better and more Emacsy, with > specifics that are especially useful for Emacs, it is > what users will (eventually) use instead of `cl-loop'. > > Since it will do everything that `cl-loop' does (and > more), eventually only the rare user who needs, or for > some reason really wants, code that is CL or close to > it will use `cl-loop'. Everyone else will use `eloop'. > No problem. I guess that might cause a lot of duplication of code. IMO experts CL lispers will be more sad with this emulation for the lack of returning multiple values than for the addition of some extensions. They can chose not to use them if they don't like them. Just one opinion too.