From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:03:37 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87inpt6lce.fsf@gmail.com> <87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87shoxc70l.fsf@secretsauce.net> <20170106030606.GB1101@holos.localdomain> <87lguovn5f.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83mvf4d3m9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483689895 29197 195.159.176.226 (6 Jan 2017 08:04:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:04:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, mvoteiza@udel.edu, dgutov@yandex.ru, 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dima Kogan To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 09:04:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPW2-0006f0-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:04:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPW6-0003Ij-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPVO-0002xo-SL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPVK-0003YU-05 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPVJ-0003YO-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:04:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPVJ-0007md-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 08:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148368982929899 (code B ref 25105); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 08:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2017 08:03:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPV7-0007mB-DK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:34455) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPPV5-0007lu-9w for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:03:47 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id b1so43284352pgc.1 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:03:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=h7HVAkZogE26d44MRRXFWm3GjkAyajJKmO4lthacB6Q=; b=ntak3rvBNEj29/ugJ77PnWwarahUkDfV8lAsambEDQL0cSeXMZ77295LRjKhrmzRcV pizX1BlwCb7v/6aCg/Kwh4jjLwuzs7qeTWg5C0Q6QZF3nB1FHBkvI+eegzuf1mAHKinm 2O+U8pGQet3s+Pqd2ekJFkUV/jR3TgCdJwhdeID4TiIGXIZN4MTA/+WwHl8kYkxV6BQK l3kSjp9C2eaWxkHIuyxKQ/Z7Sd8ovIdmIjvhxmf/ZLosYnQfISD7q4dKDpWBM0PvKu+1 hkPDyJ+26Bvi37QRmme63OHYRjmX2V7R1/AHB54BEb1Rp3LgXjizQQIVxyHt3lJ/lPQe L2Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=h7HVAkZogE26d44MRRXFWm3GjkAyajJKmO4lthacB6Q=; b=fXiZJQWkcD0mfY5QHRdBB/6SrhZdKIaIUKM45DupTwJabX4YSuCjMgl6Ay13PsLF/Q +k1ojV3ZxBc7O5RFc37IxivpzXrjEKpeQPAFGVqaRHQJxorEzUlhbV78ufmnu9ZZnFO5 AJCUMWKccGCcErf8I58YfSCRQyaDzDINUJhbklfPseQCHPa1qConDWXzZBDpCTN1i7Lx kcajOBKiczEMoxXAV3sLGXwYcw8ywDx98oolVRgg8DVJWZMdvdtXKXRo9ASNZAwvuzY4 XI802hTv6D7jqImVqZ9PPzhMtKo6FL56G5loxXsyaPfv517i3iUauGiMGuZGm5YMSHsj llyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLVF+p7kaHQaH/H9wfF3t87RY7JTVwnbXV6PBNq/KuuKzR9TWGWLKQUkLEk7aw4rg== X-Received: by 10.84.231.134 with SMTP id g6mr12742471plk.40.1483689821534; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:03:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (217.225.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.225.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l63sm101601106pfl.83.2017.01.06.00.03.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:03:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <83mvf4d3m9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127826 Archived-At: On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Dima Kogan >> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:16:12 -0800 >> Cc: 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , >> Tino Calancha , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net >> >> I consider the current behavior a significant improvement in usability, >> but if there's a consensus that it's a step backward, then I'll go back >> to carrying this patch in my local tree. > > Another alternative is to have a customizable option which will let > users decide what behavior they want. That would be OK. I would suggest to set this option nil by default, i.e., disable the new feature by default for backward compatibility.